TSTP Solution File: NUM653_8 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : NUM653_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 08:41:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   9 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  41   ~;  10   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (  15   !;   0   ?;  15   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    x: nat ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    y: nat ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    less: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    more: ( nat * nat ) > $o ).

tff(f34,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f33,f26]) ).

tff(f26,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : ~ more(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ~ more(X0,X1)
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( X0 != X1 )
        | ~ less(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ less(X0,X1)
        | ~ more(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ more(X0,X1)
        | ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( X0 != X1 )
        | ~ less(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ less(X0,X1)
        | ~ more(X0,X1) )
      & ( ~ more(X0,X1)
        | ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ~ more(X0,X1) )
       => ( ( more(X0,X1)
           => ~ less(X0,X1) )
         => ~ ( less(X0,X1)
             => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ~ more(X0,X1) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( more(X0,X1)
               => ~ less(X0,X1) )
             => ~ ( less(X0,X1)
                 => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
         => ~ more(X1,X2) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( more(X1,X2)
               => ~ less(X1,X2) )
             => ~ ( less(X1,X2)
                 => ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10b) ).

tff(f33,plain,
    more(x,x),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f18,f31]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    x = y,
    inference(resolution,[],[f30,f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ( less(x,y)
    | ( x = y ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ( x = y )
    | less(x,y) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ( ~ less(x,y)
   => ( x = y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ~ less(x,y),
    inference(resolution,[],[f22,f18]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ~ more(X0,X1)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    more(x,y),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f10,plain,
    more(x,y),
    inference(flattening,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ more(x,y),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f4,conjecture,
    ~ more(x,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10d) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : NUM653_8 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:23:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  % (27016)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27019)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.21/0.37  Detected minimum model sizes of [1,1]
% 0.21/0.37  Detected maximum model sizes of [2,2]
% 0.21/0.37  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.21/0.37  TRYING [1,2]
% 0.21/0.37  TRYING [2,2]
% 0.21/0.37  Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (27020)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)Memory used [KB]: 726
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27017)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27018)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (27020)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (27021)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27019)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27023)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.37  Detected minimum model sizes of [1]
% 0.21/0.37  Detected maximum model sizes of [6]
% 0.21/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.37  % (27023)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.37  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.37  % (27017)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.37  % (27021)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-27016"
% 0.21/0.37  % (27019)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Memory used [KB]: 749
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.37  % (27022)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.21/0.37  % (27016)Success in time 0.018 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------