TSTP Solution File: NUM632+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM632+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
sdtlpdtrp0(xc,xQ) = szDzizrdt0(xd),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(m__5309,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xn,szDzozmdt0(xd))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xd,xn) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
& aElementOf0(xn,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& aElementOf0(xn,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,xn) = xp ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5309) ).
fof(m__5568,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xc,xQ) = sdtlpdtrp0(xd,xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5568) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
sdtlpdtrp0(xc,xQ) != szDzizrdt0(xd),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
sdtlpdtrp0(xc,xQ) != szDzizrdt0(xd),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xd,xn) = szDzizrdt0(xd),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5309]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xc,xQ) = sdtlpdtrp0(xd,xn),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5568]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
sdtlpdtrp0(xc,xQ) != szDzizrdt0(xd),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : NUM632+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 19:24:59 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.366 s
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.26/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 115
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses : 4887
% 0.26/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.26/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4880
% 0.26/1.45 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.26/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4873
% 0.26/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 55894
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.26/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 377199
% 0.26/1.45
% 0.26/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.45 # User time : 0.349 s
% 0.26/1.45 # System time : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Total time : 0.368 s
% 0.26/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 21200 pages
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------