TSTP Solution File: NUM625+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM625+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 1 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__5147,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xp,xQ)
& ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
=> sdtlseqdt0(xp,X1) )
& xp = szmzizndt0(xQ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5147) ).
fof(m__5348,hypothesis,
( aElement0(xx)
& aElementOf0(xx,xQ)
& xx != szmzizndt0(xQ)
& aElementOf0(xx,xP) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5348) ).
fof(m__5496,hypothesis,
xp = xx,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5496) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
! [X2] :
( aElementOf0(xp,xQ)
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,xQ)
| sdtlseqdt0(xp,X2) )
& xp = szmzizndt0(xQ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__5147])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,hypothesis,
xx != szmzizndt0(xQ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5348]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
xp = xx,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5496]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
xp = szmzizndt0(xQ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
szmzizndt0(xQ) != xp,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : NUM625+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 23:01:19 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.29/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.29/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.29/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.315 s
% 0.29/1.46
% 0.29/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.29/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 5
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.30/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.30/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 121
% 0.30/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.30/1.46 # Initial clauses : 4890
% 0.30/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 0.30/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4882
% 0.30/1.46 # Processed clauses : 7
% 0.30/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.30/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 0.30/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.30/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.30/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.30/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4875
% 0.30/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 55851
% 0.30/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 376688
% 0.30/1.46
% 0.30/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/1.46 # User time : 0.300 s
% 0.30/1.46 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.30/1.46 # Total time : 0.317 s
% 0.30/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 20944 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------