TSTP Solution File: NUM624+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NUM624+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:20:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.51s 3.71s
% Output   : Refutation 3.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : NUM624+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 01:12:38 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.41  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.41  The process was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.41  Thu Jul  7 01:12:38 2022
% 0.22/0.41  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25034.
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.41  set(auto).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.41  clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  formula_list(usable).
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.41  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.41  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.41  clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.41     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 139 during input processing: 0 [] {-} xK!=sz00.
% 0.22/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 167 during input processing: 0 [] {-} xQ!=slcrc0.
% 0.22/0.41  180 back subsumes 179.
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 244 during input processing: 0 [] {-} aSet0(xO).
% 0.22/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 252 during input processing: 0 [] {-} aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0).
% 0.22/0.41    Following clause subsumed by 290 during input processing: 0 [copy,290,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 206.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 190.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 185.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 184.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 182.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 178.
% 0.22/0.41  290 back subsumes 172.
% 0.22/0.41  
% 0.22/0.41  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.89/1.11  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.89/1.11  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.89/1.11  number of clauses in intial UL: 190
% 0.89/1.11  number of clauses initially in problem: 266
% 0.89/1.11  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.89/1.11  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 98
% 0.89/1.11  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.89/1.11  absolute distinct symbol count: 68
% 0.89/1.11     distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.89/1.11     distinct function count: 39
% 0.89/1.11     distinct constant count: 19
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  
% 0.89/1.11  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.52/1.70  
% 1.52/1.70  
% 1.52/1.70  Changing weight limit from 60 to 30.
% 1.52/1.70  
% 1.52/1.70  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 40 givens.
% 1.52/1.70  
% 1.94/2.15  
% 1.94/2.15  
% 1.94/2.15  Changing weight limit from 30 to 23.
% 1.94/2.15  
% 1.94/2.15  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 45 givens.
% 1.94/2.15  
% 2.32/2.52  
% 2.32/2.52  
% 2.32/2.52  Changing weight limit from 23 to 20.
% 2.32/2.52  
% 2.32/2.52  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 50 givens.
% 2.32/2.52  
% 2.44/2.64  
% 2.44/2.64  
% 2.44/2.64  Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 2.44/2.64  
% 2.44/2.64  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 55 givens.
% 2.44/2.64  
% 2.52/2.78  
% 2.52/2.78  
% 2.52/2.78  Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 2.52/2.78  
% 2.52/2.78  Resetting weight limit to 18 after 65 givens.
% 2.52/2.78  
% 2.83/3.02  
% 2.83/3.02  
% 2.83/3.02  Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 2.83/3.02  
% 2.83/3.02  Resetting weight limit to 17 after 85 givens.
% 2.83/3.02  
% 3.21/3.46  
% 3.21/3.46  
% 3.21/3.46  Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 3.21/3.46  
% 3.21/3.46  Resetting weight limit to 16 after 115 givens.
% 3.21/3.46  
% 3.51/3.70  
% 3.51/3.70  
% 3.51/3.70  Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 3.51/3.70  
% 3.51/3.70  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 130 givens.
% 3.51/3.70  
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 3.51/3.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.51/3.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   3.28 sec ----> 12556 [binary,12554.1,171.1] {-} $F.
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 3.
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.51/3.71  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.51/3.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  8 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aSubsetOf0(B,A)| -aElementOf0(C,B)|aElementOf0(C,A).
% 3.51/3.71  53 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,szNzAzT0)| -aElementOf0(B,szNzAzT0)| -sdtlseqdt0(A,B)| -sdtlseqdt0(B,A)|A=B.
% 3.51/3.71  68 [] {+} -aSubsetOf0(A,szNzAzT0)|A=slcrc0|B!=szmzizndt0(A)| -aElementOf0(C,A)|sdtlseqdt0(B,C).
% 3.51/3.71  167 [] {+} xQ!=slcrc0.
% 3.51/3.71  169 [] {+} sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xm)!=slcrc0.
% 3.51/3.71  170 [] {-} xp!=xx.
% 3.51/3.71  171 [copy,170,flip.1] {+} xx!=xp.
% 3.51/3.71  208 [] {-} aSet0(szNzAzT0).
% 3.51/3.71  252 [] {-} aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0).
% 3.51/3.71  255 [] {-} xp=szmzizndt0(xQ).
% 3.51/3.71  257,256 [copy,255,flip.1] {-} szmzizndt0(xQ)=xp.
% 3.51/3.71  262 [] {-} aElementOf0(xp,xQ).
% 3.51/3.71  277 [] {-} aElementOf0(xx,szNzAzT0).
% 3.51/3.71  283 [] {-} xx=szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xm)).
% 3.51/3.71  285,284 [copy,283,flip.1] {-} szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xm))=xx.
% 3.51/3.71  287 [] {-} aElementOf0(xp,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xm)).
% 3.51/3.71  288 [] {-} aElementOf0(xx,xQ).
% 3.51/3.71  289 [] {-} aSubsetOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xm),szNzAzT0).
% 3.51/3.71  290 [] {-} A=A.
% 3.51/3.71  3682 [hyper,262,8,208,252] {-} aElementOf0(xp,szNzAzT0).
% 3.51/3.71  7694 [hyper,290,68,252,288,demod,257,unit_del,167] {-} sdtlseqdt0(xp,xx).
% 3.51/3.71  12523 [hyper,289,68,290,287,demod,285,unit_del,169] {-} sdtlseqdt0(xx,xp).
% 3.51/3.71  12554 [hyper,12523,53,3682,277,7694,flip.1] {-} xx=xp.
% 3.51/3.71  12556 [binary,12554.1,171.1] {-} $F.
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.51/3.71  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  ============ end of search ============
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.51/3.71  
% 3.51/3.71  Process 25034 finished Thu Jul  7 01:12:42 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------