TSTP Solution File: NUM622+3 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : NUM622+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:57:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.44s 1.60s
% Output   : Proof 9.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM622+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 10:48:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 9.44/1.60  Command-line arguments: --flip-ordering --lhs-weight 1 --depth-weight 60 --distributivity-heuristic
% 9.44/1.60  
% 9.44/1.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 9.44/1.60  
% 9.44/1.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 9.44/1.61  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 9.44/1.61    fof(m__, conjecture, aElementOf0(xp, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm))).
% 9.44/1.61    fof(m__4660, hypothesis, aFunction0(xe) & (szDzozmdt0(xe)=szNzAzT0 & ![W0]: (aElementOf0(W0, szNzAzT0) => (aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xe, W0), sdtlpdtrp0(xN, W0)) & (![W1]: (aElementOf0(W1, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, W0)) => sdtlseqdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xe, W0), W1)) & sdtlpdtrp0(xe, W0)=szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN, W0))))))).
% 9.44/1.61    fof(m__5309, hypothesis, aElementOf0(xn, szDzozmdt0(xd)) & (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, xn)=szDzizrdt0(xd) & (aElementOf0(xn, sdtlbdtrb0(xd, szDzizrdt0(xd))) & (aElementOf0(xn, szNzAzT0) & sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn)=xp)))).
% 9.44/1.61    fof(m__5461, hypothesis, ![W0_2]: (aElementOf0(W0_2, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xn)) => aElementOf0(W0_2, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm))) & aSubsetOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xn), sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm))).
% 9.44/1.61  
% 9.44/1.61  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 9.44/1.61  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 9.44/1.61  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 9.44/1.61    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 9.44/1.61    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 9.44/1.61  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 9.44/1.61  variables of u and v.
% 9.44/1.61  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 9.44/1.61  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 9.44/1.61  
% 9.44/1.61  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 9.44/1.61  
% 9.44/1.61  Axiom 1 (m__5309_2): aElementOf0(xn, szNzAzT0) = true2.
% 9.44/1.61  Axiom 2 (m__5309): sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn) = xp.
% 9.44/1.61  Axiom 3 (m__4660_3): fresh56(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 9.44/1.61  Axiom 4 (m__5461_1): fresh16(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 9.44/1.61  Axiom 5 (m__4660_3): fresh56(aElementOf0(X, szNzAzT0), true2, X) = aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xe, X), sdtlpdtrp0(xN, X)).
% 9.44/1.61  Axiom 6 (m__5461_1): fresh16(aElementOf0(X, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xn)), true2, X) = aElementOf0(X, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm)).
% 9.44/1.61  
% 9.44/1.61  Goal 1 (m__): aElementOf0(xp, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm)) = true2.
% 9.44/1.61  Proof:
% 9.44/1.61    aElementOf0(xp, sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm))
% 9.44/1.61  = { by axiom 2 (m__5309) R->L }
% 9.44/1.61    aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn), sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xm))
% 9.44/1.61  = { by axiom 6 (m__5461_1) R->L }
% 9.44/1.61    fresh16(aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn), sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xn)), true2, sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn))
% 9.44/1.61  = { by axiom 5 (m__4660_3) R->L }
% 9.44/1.61    fresh16(fresh56(aElementOf0(xn, szNzAzT0), true2, xn), true2, sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn))
% 9.44/1.61  = { by axiom 1 (m__5309_2) }
% 9.44/1.61    fresh16(fresh56(true2, true2, xn), true2, sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn))
% 9.44/1.61  = { by axiom 3 (m__4660_3) }
% 9.44/1.61    fresh16(true2, true2, sdtlpdtrp0(xe, xn))
% 9.44/1.61  = { by axiom 4 (m__5461_1) }
% 9.44/1.61    true2
% 9.44/1.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 9.44/1.61  
% 9.44/1.61  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------