TSTP Solution File: NUM615+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM615+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.28s 1.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   8   ~;   6   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   0 sgn   1   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ? [X1] :
      ( ( ( aElementOf0(X1,szDzozmdt0(xd))
          & sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) = szDzizrdt0(xd) )
        | aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd))) )
      & sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xp ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(m__5182,hypothesis,
    ? [X1] :
      ( aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
      & sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xp ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5182) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] :
        ( ( ( aElementOf0(X1,szDzozmdt0(xd))
            & sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X1) = szDzizrdt0(xd) )
          | aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd))) )
        & sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xp ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(xd))
        | sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X2) != szDzizrdt0(xd)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) != xp )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
        | sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) != xp ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(esk22_0,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
    & sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk22_0) = xp ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__5182])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) != xp
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(esk22_0,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk22_0) = xp,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.14  % Problem  : NUM615+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.15  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 12:59:14 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.28/1.47  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.369 s
% 0.28/1.47  
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object total steps             : 9
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object clause steps            : 4
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object generating inferences   : 1
% 0.28/1.47  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.28/1.47  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 111
% 0.28/1.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10
% 0.28/1.47  # Initial clauses                      : 4885
% 0.28/1.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.28/1.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4878
% 0.28/1.47  # Processed clauses                    : 39
% 0.28/1.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.28/1.47  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.28/1.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 33
% 0.28/1.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.28/1.47  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.28/1.47  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 3
% 0.28/1.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.28/1.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 0.28/1.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.28/1.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.28/1.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.28/1.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4842
% 0.28/1.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 55864
% 0.28/1.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.28/1.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.28/1.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.28/1.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.28/1.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.28/1.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.28/1.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.28/1.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.28/1.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 377408
% 0.28/1.47  
% 0.28/1.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.47  # User time                : 0.353 s
% 0.28/1.47  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.28/1.47  # Total time               : 0.371 s
% 0.28/1.47  # Maximum resident set size: 21196 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------