TSTP Solution File: NUM613+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM613+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 25 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mSuccEquSucc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0) )
=> ( szszuzczcdt0(X1) = szszuzczcdt0(X2)
=> X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mSuccEquSucc) ).
fof(m__5255,hypothesis,
( sbrdtbr0(xQ) = szszuzczcdt0(xk)
& szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = sbrdtbr0(xQ)
& aElementOf0(sbrdtbr0(xP),szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5255) ).
fof(m__,conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(m__3533,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xk,szNzAzT0)
& szszuzczcdt0(xk) = xK ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__3533) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X3,szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,szNzAzT0)
| szszuzczcdt0(X3) != szszuzczcdt0(X4)
| X3 = X4 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSuccEquSucc])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = sbrdtbr0(xQ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5255]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sbrdtbr0(xQ) = szszuzczcdt0(xk),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5255]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X1 = X2
| szszuzczcdt0(X1) != szszuzczcdt0(X2)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(xk) = xK,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3533]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xk,szNzAzT0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3533]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = szszuzczcdt0(xk),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( X1 = xk
| szszuzczcdt0(X1) != xK
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = xK,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sbrdtbr0(xP),szNzAzT0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5255]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : NUM613+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 20:07:04 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.28/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 110
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses : 190
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 183
% 0.28/1.46 # Processed clauses : 284
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # ...subsumed : 28
% 0.28/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 245
% 0.28/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 0.28/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Generated clauses : 684
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 631
% 0.28/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 23
% 0.28/1.46 # Paramodulations : 654
% 0.28/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 30
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 241
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 67
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 22
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 152
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 530
% 0.28/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 2707
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5768
% 0.28/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1281
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26
% 0.28/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2058
% 0.28/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 24793
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46 # User time : 0.048 s
% 0.28/1.46 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 4820 pages
% 0.28/23.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.28/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------