TSTP Solution File: NUM613+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM613+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:56:37 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 10 ~; 8 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn; 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mSuccEquSucc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0) )
=> ( szszuzczcdt0(X1) = szszuzczcdt0(X2)
=> X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0oHa4ghw0D/E---3.1_6052.p',mSuccEquSucc) ).
fof(m__5255,hypothesis,
( sbrdtbr0(xQ) = szszuzczcdt0(xk)
& szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = sbrdtbr0(xQ)
& aElementOf0(sbrdtbr0(xP),szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0oHa4ghw0D/E---3.1_6052.p',m__5255) ).
fof(m__3533,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(xk,szNzAzT0)
& szszuzczcdt0(xk) = xK ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0oHa4ghw0D/E---3.1_6052.p',m__3533) ).
fof(m__,conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0oHa4ghw0D/E---3.1_6052.p',m__) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X102,X103] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X102,szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X103,szNzAzT0)
| szszuzczcdt0(X102) != szszuzczcdt0(X103)
| X102 = X103 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSuccEquSucc])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
sbrdtbr0(xQ) = szszuzczcdt0(xk),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5255]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(xk) = xK,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3533]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
| szszuzczcdt0(X1) != szszuzczcdt0(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xk,szNzAzT0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3533]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = sbrdtbr0(xQ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5255]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xK,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
( X1 = xk
| szszuzczcdt0(X1) != xK
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
szszuzczcdt0(sbrdtbr0(xP)) = xK,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(sbrdtbr0(xP),szNzAzT0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5255]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13 % Problem : NUM613+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 14:18:06 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.0oHa4ghw0D/E---3.1_6052.p
% 0.17/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 6131 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 6140 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 110
% 0.17/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9
% 0.17/0.49 # Initial clauses : 190
% 0.17/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.17/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 183
% 0.17/0.49 # Processed clauses : 356
% 0.17/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.17/0.49 # ...subsumed : 8
% 0.17/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 345
% 0.17/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 36
% 0.17/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.17/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.17/0.49 # Generated clauses : 140
% 0.17/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 107
% 0.17/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 15
% 0.17/0.49 # Paramodulations : 108
% 0.17/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 37
% 0.17/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 141
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 132
% 0.17/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 65
% 0.17/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.17/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 53
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 114
% 0.17/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 495
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 185
% 0.17/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5175
% 0.17/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1160
% 0.17/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.17/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% 0.17/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.17/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.17/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 15482
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49 # User time : 0.025 s
% 0.17/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 2436 pages
% 0.17/0.49
% 0.17/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49 # User time : 0.026 s
% 0.17/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.17/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.17/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------