TSTP Solution File: NUM610+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : NUM610+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:07:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  29   ~;  27   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn;  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mSubTrans,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aSet0(X1)
        & aSet0(X2)
        & aSet0(X3) )
     => ( ( aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)
          & aSubsetOf0(X2,X3) )
       => aSubsetOf0(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p',mSubTrans) ).

fof(mDefSub,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,X1)
        <=> ( aSet0(X2)
            & ! [X3] :
                ( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
               => aElementOf0(X3,X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p',mDefSub) ).

fof(m__5093,hypothesis,
    ( aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO)
    & xQ != slcrc0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p',m__5093) ).

fof(m__4891,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xO)
    & xO = sdtlcdtrc0(xe,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p',m__4891) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    aSubsetOf0(xP,xO),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p',m__) ).

fof(m__5195,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xP,xQ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p',m__5195) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X25)
      | ~ aSet0(X26)
      | ~ aSet0(X27)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(X25,X26)
      | ~ aSubsetOf0(X26,X27)
      | aSubsetOf0(X25,X27) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSubTrans])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( aSet0(X16)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X16,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X17,X16)
        | aElementOf0(X17,X15)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X16,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk2_2(X15,X18),X18)
        | ~ aSet0(X18)
        | aSubsetOf0(X18,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk2_2(X15,X18),X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X18)
        | aSubsetOf0(X18,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSub])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( aSubsetOf0(X1,X3)
    | ~ aSet0(X1)
    | ~ aSet0(X2)
    | ~ aSet0(X3)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( aSet0(X1)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aSet0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X3,X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,X3)
    | ~ aSet0(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5093]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4891]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xP,xO),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( aSubsetOf0(X1,xO)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,xQ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xP,xQ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5195]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xP,xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : NUM610+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:29:52 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DpAoK7g5u9/E---3.1_20393.p
% 0.16/0.47  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 20471 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.47  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 20476 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.47  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.47  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.47  
% 0.16/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 108
% 0.16/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 212
% 0.16/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.16/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 205
% 0.16/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 442
% 0.16/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.16/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.16/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 429
% 0.16/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 48
% 0.16/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.16/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.16/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 306
% 0.16/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 259
% 0.16/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 18
% 0.16/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 262
% 0.16/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 49
% 0.16/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 219
% 0.16/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 180
% 0.16/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 60
% 0.16/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 13
% 0.16/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 107
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 223
% 0.16/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 954
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 209
% 0.16/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9670
% 0.16/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3085
% 0.16/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 22
% 0.16/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 324
% 0.16/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.16/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.16/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 19911
% 0.16/0.47  
% 0.16/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47  # User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.16/0.47  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 2460 pages
% 0.16/0.47  
% 0.16/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.47  # User time                : 0.144 s
% 0.16/0.47  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Total time               : 0.161 s
% 0.16/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1820 pages
% 0.16/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------