TSTP Solution File: NUM609+3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : NUM609+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:07:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 36.73s 5.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 36.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 36 ( 5 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 40 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 13 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn; 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xP)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xQ) )
| aSubsetOf0(xP,xQ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tv5TkbxCvI/E---3.1_22939.p',m__) ).
fof(m__5164,hypothesis,
( aSet0(xP)
& ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
=> sdtlseqdt0(szmzizndt0(xQ),X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xP)
<=> ( aElement0(X1)
& aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
& X1 != szmzizndt0(xQ) ) )
& xP = sdtmndt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(xQ)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tv5TkbxCvI/E---3.1_22939.p',m__5164) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xP)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xQ) )
| aSubsetOf0(xP,xQ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
! [X253,X254] :
( aSet0(xP)
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X253,xQ)
| sdtlseqdt0(szmzizndt0(xQ),X253) )
& ( aElement0(X254)
| ~ aElementOf0(X254,xP) )
& ( aElementOf0(X254,xQ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X254,xP) )
& ( X254 != szmzizndt0(xQ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X254,xP) )
& ( ~ aElement0(X254)
| ~ aElementOf0(X254,xQ)
| X254 = szmzizndt0(xQ)
| aElementOf0(X254,xP) )
& xP = sdtmndt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(xQ)) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__5164])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( aElementOf0(esk42_0,xP)
& ~ aElementOf0(esk42_0,xQ)
& ~ aSubsetOf0(xP,xQ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xP) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(esk42_0,xQ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
aElementOf0(esk42_0,xP),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6,c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : NUM609+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:17:22 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tv5TkbxCvI/E---3.1_22939.p
% 36.73/5.19 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 36.73/5.19 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 36.73/5.19 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 23016 completed with status 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 36.73/5.19 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 36.73/5.19 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # No SInE strategy applied
% 36.73/5.19 # Search class: FGHSF-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 36.73/5.19 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2o with 811s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 23023 completed with status 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 36.73/5.19 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 36.73/5.19 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # No SInE strategy applied
% 36.73/5.19 # Search class: FGHSF-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 36.73/5.19 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2o with 811s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 36.73/5.19 # Preprocessing time : 0.159 s
% 36.73/5.19 # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 36.73/5.19 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 36.73/5.19
% 36.73/5.19 # Proof found!
% 36.73/5.19 # SZS status Theorem
% 36.73/5.19 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 36.73/5.19 # Parsed axioms : 107
% 36.73/5.19 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Initial clauses : 4907
% 36.73/5.19 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 36.73/5.19 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4900
% 36.73/5.19 # Processed clauses : 5752
% 36.73/5.19 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 36.73/5.19 # ...subsumed : 748
% 36.73/5.19 # ...remaining for further processing : 5000
% 36.73/5.19 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1673
% 36.73/5.19 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Backward-subsumed : 16
% 36.73/5.19 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 36.73/5.19 # Generated clauses : 1545
% 36.73/5.19 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1546
% 36.73/5.19 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 69
% 36.73/5.19 # Paramodulations : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Factorizations : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # NegExts : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Equation resolutions : 1673
% 36.73/5.19 # Total rewrite steps : 33
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional check models : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional clauses : 4132
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional clauses after purity: 83
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional unsat core size : 3
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional encoding time : 0.023
% 36.73/5.19 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 36.73/5.19 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 36.73/5.19 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.023
% 36.73/5.19 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 36.73/5.19 # Current number of processed clauses : 3438
% 36.73/5.19 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 51
% 36.73/5.19 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 36.73/5.19 # Non-unit-clauses : 3380
% 36.73/5.19 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 694
% 36.73/5.19 # ...number of literals in the above : 10078
% 36.73/5.19 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 36.73/5.19 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6455660
% 36.73/5.19 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60746
% 36.73/5.19 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 832
% 36.73/5.19 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 219
% 36.73/5.19 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 36.73/5.19 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 36.73/5.19 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Condensation successes : 0
% 36.73/5.19 # Termbank termtop insertions : 700060
% 36.73/5.19
% 36.73/5.19 # -------------------------------------------------
% 36.73/5.19 # User time : 4.720 s
% 36.73/5.19 # System time : 0.028 s
% 36.73/5.19 # Total time : 4.748 s
% 36.73/5.19 # Maximum resident set size: 14268 pages
% 36.73/5.19
% 36.73/5.19 # -------------------------------------------------
% 36.73/5.19 # User time : 22.575 s
% 36.73/5.19 # System time : 0.093 s
% 36.73/5.19 # Total time : 22.668 s
% 36.73/5.19 # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 36.73/5.19 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------