TSTP Solution File: NUM605+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NUM605+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:19:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.85s 3.08s
% Output   : Refutation 2.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NUM605+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 09:09:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.37  Tue Jul  5 09:09:47 2022
% 0.18/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 18035.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 139 during input processing: 0 [] {-} xK!=sz00.
% 0.18/0.37  175 back subsumes 174.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 239 during input processing: 0 [] {-} aSet0(xO).
% 0.18/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 248 during input processing: 0 [copy,248,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 201.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 185.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 180.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 179.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 177.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 173.
% 0.18/0.37  248 back subsumes 167.
% 0.18/0.37  
% 0.18/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.96  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.96  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.96  number of clauses in intial UL: 187
% 0.76/0.96  number of clauses initially in problem: 231
% 0.76/0.96  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.76/0.96  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 98
% 0.76/0.96  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.76/0.96  absolute distinct symbol count: 63
% 0.76/0.96     distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.76/0.96     distinct function count: 39
% 0.76/0.96     distinct constant count: 14
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  
% 0.76/0.96  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.50/1.74  Changing weight limit from 60 to 30.
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.50/1.74  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 45 givens.
% 1.50/1.74  
% 1.80/2.05  
% 1.80/2.05  
% 1.80/2.05  Changing weight limit from 30 to 27.
% 1.80/2.05  
% 1.80/2.05  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 50 givens.
% 1.80/2.05  
% 2.03/2.23  
% 2.03/2.23  
% 2.03/2.23  Changing weight limit from 27 to 25.
% 2.03/2.23  
% 2.03/2.23  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 55 givens.
% 2.03/2.23  
% 2.41/2.64  
% 2.41/2.64  
% 2.41/2.64  Changing weight limit from 25 to 22.
% 2.41/2.64  
% 2.41/2.64  Resetting weight limit to 22 after 60 givens.
% 2.41/2.64  
% 2.54/2.80  
% 2.54/2.80  
% 2.54/2.80  Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 2.54/2.80  
% 2.54/2.80  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 65 givens.
% 2.54/2.80  
% 2.78/2.96  
% 2.78/2.96  
% 2.78/2.96  Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 2.78/2.96  
% 2.78/2.96  Resetting weight limit to 20 after 70 givens.
% 2.78/2.96  
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.85/3.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.85/3.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.70 sec ----> 9751 [binary,9749.1,139.1] {-} $F.
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.85/3.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.85/3.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  91 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,szNzAzT0)|sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(A))=A.
% 2.85/3.08  94 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aElementOf0(B,szNzAzT0)|C!=slbdtsldtrb0(A,B)| -aElementOf0(D,C)|sbrdtbr0(D)=B.
% 2.85/3.08  139 [] {+} xK!=sz00.
% 2.85/3.08  205 [] {-} aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0).
% 2.85/3.08  207,206 [] {-} slbdtrb0(sz00)=slcrc0.
% 2.85/3.08  210 [] {-} aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0).
% 2.85/3.08  239 [] {-} aSet0(xO).
% 2.85/3.08  245 [] {-} aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)).
% 2.85/3.08  247,246 [] {-} xQ=slcrc0.
% 2.85/3.08  248 [] {-} A=A.
% 2.85/3.08  249 [back_demod,245,demod,247] {-} aElementOf0(slcrc0,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)).
% 2.85/3.08  529,528 [hyper,205,91,demod,207] {-} sbrdtbr0(slcrc0)=sz00.
% 2.85/3.08  9749 [hyper,249,94,239,210,248,demod,529,flip.1] {-} xK=sz00.
% 2.85/3.08  9751 [binary,9749.1,139.1] {-} $F.
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.85/3.08  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  ============ end of search ============
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.85/3.08  
% 2.85/3.08  Process 18035 finished Tue Jul  5 09:09:50 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------