TSTP Solution File: NUM605+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM605+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   39 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (  42   ~;  41   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   2 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    xQ != slcrc0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(mDefSel,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aSet0(X1)
        & aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( X3 = slbdtsldtrb0(X1,X2)
        <=> ( aSet0(X3)
            & ! [X4] :
                ( aElementOf0(X4,X3)
              <=> ( aSubsetOf0(X4,X1)
                  & sbrdtbr0(X4) = X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mDefSel) ).

fof(mCardSeg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
     => sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(X1)) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mCardSeg) ).

fof(mSegZero,axiom,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mSegZero) ).

fof(mZeroNum,axiom,
    aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mZeroNum) ).

fof(m__5078,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5078) ).

fof(m__3418,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__3418) ).

fof(m__4891,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xO)
    & xO = sdtlcdtrc0(xe,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__4891) ).

fof(m__3462,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__3462) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( xQ != slcrc0 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X7] :
      ( ( aSet0(X7)
        | X7 != slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( aSubsetOf0(X8,X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X8,X7)
        | X7 != slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( sbrdtbr0(X8) = X6
        | ~ aElementOf0(X8,X7)
        | X7 != slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,X5)
        | sbrdtbr0(X8) != X6
        | aElementOf0(X8,X7)
        | X7 != slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | sbrdtbr0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7)) != X6
        | ~ aSet0(X7)
        | X7 = slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( aSubsetOf0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | aElementOf0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | ~ aSet0(X7)
        | X7 = slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( sbrdtbr0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7)) = X6
        | aElementOf0(esk21_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | ~ aSet0(X7)
        | X7 = slbdtsldtrb0(X5,X6)
        | ~ aSet0(X5)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X6,szNzAzT0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSel])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
      | sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(X2)) = X2 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mCardSeg])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mSegZero]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( sbrdtbr0(X4) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aSet0(X2)
    | X3 != slbdtsldtrb0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) = xQ,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mZeroNum]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = X2
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(X3,X2))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aSet0(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5078]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    sbrdtbr0(xQ) = sz00,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3418]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4891]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3462]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM605+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 09:27:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 26
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 100
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 193
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 186
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 1576
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 38
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 774
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 764
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 14
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 56
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 4419
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 3928
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 478
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 4363
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 56
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 691
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 92
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 42
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 557
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2371
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 12866
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 70
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 67089
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28466
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 863
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4391
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 84623
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.174 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.181 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 7760 pages
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------