TSTP Solution File: NUM602+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM602+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 19 ~; 17 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__4982,hypothesis,
! [X1] :
( ( ? [X2] :
( aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) = X1 )
| aElementOf0(X1,xO) )
=> ? [X2] :
( aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X2) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
& aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',m__4982) ).
fof(m__5009,hypothesis,
( ? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,xO) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',m__5009) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X3),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X4) != X3 )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,esk3_1(X3)) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X4) != X3 )
& ( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X3),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X4) != X3 )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk3_1(X3)) = X3
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X4) != X3 )
& ( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X3),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,esk3_1(X3)) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) )
& ( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X3),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk3_1(X3)) = X3
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__4982])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk1_0,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk1_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,xO) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__5009])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) != xx ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk3_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk3_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk3_1(xx)) = xx,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk3_1(xx),szNzAzT0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : NUM602+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 04:47:42 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.26/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.26/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 7
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 99
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 76
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses : 72
% 0.26/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 70
% 0.26/1.44 # Processed clauses : 75
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.26/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Generated clauses : 39
% 0.26/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 38
% 0.26/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Paramodulations : 36
% 0.26/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 70
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.26/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 53
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 0.26/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 82
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 281
% 0.26/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79
% 0.26/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.26/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.26/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7966
% 0.26/1.44
% 0.26/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.26/1.44 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.26/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 3296 pages
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------