TSTP Solution File: NUM602+3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM602+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:56:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 56.71s 7.90s
% Output : CNFRefutation 56.71s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 54 ( 19 ~; 17 |; 17 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn; 4 !; 5 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TsOA52pajA/E---3.1_31477.p',m__) ).
fof(m__4982,hypothesis,
! [X1] :
( ( ? [X2] :
( aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) = X1 )
| aElementOf0(X1,xO) )
=> ? [X2] :
( aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X2) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
& aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TsOA52pajA/E---3.1_31477.p',m__4982) ).
fof(m__5009,hypothesis,
( ? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx )
& aElementOf0(xx,xO) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TsOA52pajA/E---3.1_31477.p',m__5009) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
! [X58,X59] :
( ( aElementOf0(esk11_1(X58),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X59,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X59) != X58 )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,esk11_1(X58)) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
| ~ aElementOf0(X59,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X59) != X58 )
& ( aElementOf0(esk11_1(X58),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X59,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X59) != X58 )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk11_1(X58)) = X58
| ~ aElementOf0(X59,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X59) != X58 )
& ( aElementOf0(esk11_1(X58),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X58,xO) )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,esk11_1(X58)) = szDzizrdt0(xd)
| ~ aElementOf0(X58,xO) )
& ( aElementOf0(esk11_1(X58),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X58,xO) )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk11_1(X58)) = X58
| ~ aElementOf0(X58,xO) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__4982])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk1_0,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk1_0) = xx
& aElementOf0(xx,xO) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__5009])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X8] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X8,szNzAzT0)
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X8) != xx ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk11_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk11_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) != xx ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk11_1(xx)) = xx,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk11_1(xx),szNzAzT0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : NUM602+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.16/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:11:50 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TsOA52pajA/E---3.1_31477.p
% 56.71/7.90 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 56.71/7.90 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 56.71/7.90 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # sh5l with pid 31634 completed with status 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Result found by sh5l
% 56.71/7.90 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 56.71/7.90 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 56.71/7.90 # Search class: FGHSF-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 56.71/7.90 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2o with 163s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2o with pid 31670 completed with status 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2o
% 56.71/7.90 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 56.71/7.90 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 56.71/7.90 # Search class: FGHSF-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 56.71/7.90 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 56.71/7.90 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2o with 163s (1) cores
% 56.71/7.90 # Preprocessing time : 0.104 s
% 56.71/7.90 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 56.71/7.90
% 56.71/7.90 # Proof found!
% 56.71/7.90 # SZS status Theorem
% 56.71/7.90 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 56.71/7.90 # Parsed axioms : 99
% 56.71/7.90 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 56.71/7.90 # Initial clauses : 4869
% 56.71/7.90 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 56.71/7.90 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4862
% 56.71/7.90 # Processed clauses : 6866
% 56.71/7.90 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 56.71/7.90 # ...subsumed : 891
% 56.71/7.90 # ...remaining for further processing : 5972
% 56.71/7.90 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2035
% 56.71/7.90 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Backward-subsumed : 17
% 56.71/7.90 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 56.71/7.90 # Generated clauses : 2038
% 56.71/7.90 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2022
% 56.71/7.90 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 70
% 56.71/7.90 # Paramodulations : 203
% 56.71/7.90 # Factorizations : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # NegExts : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Equation resolutions : 2035
% 56.71/7.90 # Total rewrite steps : 88
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional check models : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 56.71/7.90 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 56.71/7.90 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 56.71/7.90 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 56.71/7.90 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 56.71/7.90 # Current number of processed clauses : 157
% 56.71/7.90 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 86
% 56.71/7.90 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Negative unit clauses : 19
% 56.71/7.90 # Non-unit-clauses : 52
% 56.71/7.90 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3978
% 56.71/7.90 # ...number of literals in the above : 44202
% 56.71/7.90 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Current number of archived clauses : 3980
% 56.71/7.90 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10348261
% 56.71/7.90 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 73779
% 56.71/7.90 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 971
% 56.71/7.90 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 820
% 56.71/7.90 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 56.71/7.90 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 56.71/7.90 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Condensation successes : 0
% 56.71/7.90 # Termbank termtop insertions : 663413
% 56.71/7.90
% 56.71/7.90 # -------------------------------------------------
% 56.71/7.90 # User time : 6.980 s
% 56.71/7.90 # System time : 0.032 s
% 56.71/7.90 # Total time : 7.012 s
% 56.71/7.90 # Maximum resident set size: 14296 pages
% 56.71/7.90
% 56.71/7.90 # -------------------------------------------------
% 56.71/7.90 # User time : 6.985 s
% 56.71/7.90 # System time : 0.037 s
% 56.71/7.90 # Total time : 7.022 s
% 56.71/7.90 # Maximum resident set size: 1848 pages
% 56.71/7.90 % E---3.1 exiting
% 56.71/7.90 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------