TSTP Solution File: NUM602+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM602+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:37:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.48s 2.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.48s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 5 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_197,hypothesis,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk25_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tafm3gbb/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).
cnf(i_0_200,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tafm3gbb/lgb.p',i_0_200) ).
cnf(i_0_199,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk25_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tafm3gbb/lgb.p',i_0_199) ).
cnf(i_0_201,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tafm3gbb/lgb.p',i_0_201) ).
cnf(c_0_206,hypothesis,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk25_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
i_0_197 ).
cnf(c_0_207,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
i_0_200 ).
cnf(c_0_208,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk25_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
i_0_199 ).
cnf(c_0_209,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
i_0_201 ).
cnf(c_0_210,hypothesis,
sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk25_1(xx)) = xx,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_206,c_0_207]) ).
cnf(c_0_211,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk25_1(xx),szNzAzT0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_208,c_0_207]) ).
cnf(c_0_212,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_209,c_0_210]),c_0_211])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM602+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 13:54:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.48/2.36 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.48/2.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.48/2.36 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.48/2.36 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S4S
% 7.48/2.36 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.48/2.36 #
% 7.48/2.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.48/2.36
% 7.48/2.36 # Proof found!
% 7.48/2.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.48/2.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.48/2.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.48/2.36
% 7.48/2.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.48/2.36 # User time : 0.025 s
% 7.48/2.36 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.48/2.36 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 7.48/2.36 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.48/2.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------