TSTP Solution File: NUM602+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM602+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:34:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.28s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 27 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 12 ~; 8 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 3 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).
fof(m__4982,hypothesis,
! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xO)
=> ? [X2] :
( aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
& aElementOf0(X2,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__4982) ).
fof(m__5009,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__5009) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
& sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) = xx ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
| sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X2) != xx ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
! [X3] :
( ( aElementOf0(esk6_1(X3),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) )
& ( aElementOf0(esk6_1(X3),sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) )
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk6_1(X3)) = X3
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,xO) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__4982])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xe,esk6_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(esk6_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( X1 != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,xO),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5009]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : NUM602+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 13:46:59 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.28/1.46 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.28/1.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.28/1.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof found!
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/1.46 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object total steps : 12
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.28/1.46 # Parsed axioms : 99
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses : 192
% 0.28/1.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.28/1.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 185
% 0.28/1.46 # Processed clauses : 316
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.28/1.46 # ...subsumed : 42
% 0.28/1.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 273
% 0.28/1.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 0.28/1.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Generated clauses : 865
% 0.28/1.46 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 804
% 0.28/1.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 32
% 0.28/1.46 # Paramodulations : 832
% 0.28/1.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Equation resolutions : 33
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 265
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 59
% 0.28/1.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Negative unit clauses : 16
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 190
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 673
% 0.28/1.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 3600
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.28/1.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7751
% 0.28/1.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2298
% 0.28/1.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 44
% 0.28/1.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1940
% 0.28/1.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/1.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 28978
% 0.28/1.46
% 0.28/1.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/1.46 # User time : 0.059 s
% 0.28/1.46 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Total time : 0.070 s
% 0.28/1.46 # Maximum resident set size: 4856 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------