TSTP Solution File: NUM587+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM587+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:56:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   42 (  16   ~;  15   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn;   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDefSub,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,X1)
        <=> ( aSet0(X2)
            & ! [X3] :
                ( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
               => aElementOf0(X3,X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RyeZ4uHPji/E---3.1_19698.p',mDefSub) ).

fof(m__3453,hypothesis,
    ( aFunction0(xc)
    & szDzozmdt0(xc) = slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xK)
    & aSubsetOf0(sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc)),xT) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RyeZ4uHPji/E---3.1_19698.p',m__3453) ).

fof(m__3291,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xT)
    & isFinite0(xT) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RyeZ4uHPji/E---3.1_19698.p',m__3291) ).

fof(m__4263,hypothesis,
    ( xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))))
    & aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi)))),sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RyeZ4uHPji/E---3.1_19698.p',m__4263) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RyeZ4uHPji/E---3.1_19698.p',m__) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( aSet0(X16)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X16,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X17,X16)
        | aElementOf0(X17,X15)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X16,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk2_2(X15,X18),X18)
        | ~ aSet0(X18)
        | aSubsetOf0(X18,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk2_2(X15,X18),X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X18)
        | aSubsetOf0(X18,X15)
        | ~ aSet0(X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSub])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(X1,X3)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)
    | ~ aSet0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc)),xT),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3453]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xT),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3291]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi)))),sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4263]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4263]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(X1,xT)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11  % Problem    : NUM587+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:17:54 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RyeZ4uHPji/E---3.1_19698.p
% 0.18/0.47  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 19776 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.47  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 901s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0U with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 146s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 19783 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.47  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 901s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 91
% 0.18/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 182
% 0.18/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 175
% 0.18/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 177
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 22
% 0.18/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 154
% 0.18/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 17
% 0.18/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.18/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 172
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 128
% 0.18/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.18/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 155
% 0.18/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 18
% 0.18/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 124
% 0.18/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 137
% 0.18/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 0.18/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.18/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 86
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 124
% 0.18/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 638
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.18/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1701
% 0.18/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1085
% 0.18/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
% 0.18/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 192
% 0.18/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.18/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.18/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 14448
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 2364 pages
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time                : 0.062 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time               : 0.076 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1792 pages
% 0.18/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.48  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------