TSTP Solution File: NUM587+1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM587+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 01:14:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  17   ~;  15   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDefSub,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,X1)
        <=> ( aSet0(X2)
            & ! [X3] :
                ( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
               => aElementOf0(X3,X1) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSub) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(m__3453,hypothesis,
    ( aFunction0(xc)
    & szDzozmdt0(xc) = slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xK)
    & aSubsetOf0(sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc)),xT) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3453) ).

fof(m__3291,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xT)
    & isFinite0(xT) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3291) ).

fof(m__4263,hypothesis,
    ( xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))))
    & aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi)))),sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4263) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( aSet0(X20)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X20,X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X19) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X21,X20)
        | aElementOf0(X21,X19)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X20,X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X19) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk2_2(X19,X22),X22)
        | ~ aSet0(X22)
        | aSubsetOf0(X22,X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X19) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk2_2(X19,X22),X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X22)
        | aSubsetOf0(X22,X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSub])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(X1,X3)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)
    | ~ aSet0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc)),xT),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3453]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xT),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3291]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi)))),sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4263]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4263]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(X1,xT)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xc,szDzozmdt0(xc))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xT),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : NUM587+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 06:22:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.51  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 25739 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.18/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 901s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0U with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 146s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 25747 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.18/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.51  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 901s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 91
% 0.18/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 182
% 0.18/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.18/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 175
% 0.18/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 177
% 0.18/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.18/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 22
% 0.18/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 154
% 0.18/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 17
% 0.18/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.18/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.18/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 172
% 0.18/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 128
% 0.18/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 0.18/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 155
% 0.18/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 18
% 0.18/0.51  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 124
% 0.18/0.51  # ...of those cached                   : 99
% 0.18/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 137
% 0.18/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 42
% 0.18/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.18/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 86
% 0.18/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 124
% 0.18/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 638
% 0.18/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.18/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1701
% 0.18/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1085
% 0.18/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
% 0.18/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 192
% 0.18/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.18/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.18/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 16605
% 0.18/0.51  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 3528
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.18/0.51  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.51  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.18/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 2380 pages
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.51  # User time                : 0.070 s
% 0.18/0.51  # System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.18/0.51  # Total time               : 0.088 s
% 0.18/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
% 0.18/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------