TSTP Solution File: NUM586+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM586+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:37:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.63s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 24 equ; 57 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_178,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtmndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi),szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))),xk)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_178) ).
cnf(i_0_172,hypothesis,
( slbdtsldtrb0(sdtmndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,X1),szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,X1))),xk) = szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X1))
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_172) ).
cnf(i_0_176,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xi,szNzAzT0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_176) ).
cnf(i_0_131,plain,
( aElementOf0(esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
| X3 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
| ~ aFunction0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
| ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_131) ).
cnf(i_0_130,plain,
( sdtlpdtrp0(X1,esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = X4
| X3 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
| ~ aFunction0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
| ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_130) ).
cnf(i_0_173,hypothesis,
( aFunction0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X1))
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_173) ).
cnf(i_0_17,plain,
( aSubsetOf0(X1,X1)
| ~ aSet0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_116,plain,
( aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X1))
| ~ aFunction0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_116) ).
cnf(i_0_177,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-97ct0vlm/lgb.p',i_0_177) ).
cnf(c_0_188,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtmndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi),szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))),xk)) ),
i_0_178 ).
cnf(c_0_189,hypothesis,
( slbdtsldtrb0(sdtmndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,X1),szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,X1))),xk) = szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X1))
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
i_0_172 ).
cnf(c_0_190,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xi,szNzAzT0),
i_0_176 ).
cnf(c_0_191,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),X1) != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_188,c_0_189]),c_0_190])]) ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
( aElementOf0(esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
| X3 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
| ~ aFunction0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
| ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
i_0_131 ).
cnf(c_0_193,plain,
( sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),esk14_4(X1,szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)),X2,X3)) != xx
| X2 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| ~ aSubsetOf0(szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)),szDzozmdt0(X1))
| ~ aFunction0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_191,c_0_192]) ).
cnf(c_0_194,plain,
( sdtlpdtrp0(X1,esk14_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = X4
| X3 != sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
| ~ aFunction0(X1)
| ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
| ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
i_0_130 ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| X2 != xx
| ~ aSubsetOf0(szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| ~ aFunction0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi))
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_193,c_0_194]) ).
cnf(c_0_196,hypothesis,
( aFunction0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X1))
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
i_0_173 ).
cnf(c_0_197,hypothesis,
( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| X2 != xx
| ~ aSubsetOf0(szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_195,c_0_196]),c_0_190])]) ).
cnf(c_0_198,plain,
( aSubsetOf0(X1,X1)
| ~ aSet0(X1) ),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_199,plain,
( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| X2 != xx
| ~ aSet0(szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_197,c_0_198]) ).
cnf(c_0_200,plain,
( aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X1))
| ~ aFunction0(X1) ),
i_0_116 ).
cnf(c_0_201,plain,
( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| X2 != xx
| ~ aFunction0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi))
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_199,c_0_200]) ).
cnf(c_0_202,hypothesis,
( X1 != sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))
| X2 != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_201,c_0_196]),c_0_190])]) ).
cnf(c_0_203,hypothesis,
( X1 != xx
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_202]) ).
cnf(c_0_204,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi),szDzozmdt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,xi)))),
i_0_177 ).
cnf(c_0_205,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_203,c_0_204]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : NUM586+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 13:34:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.63/2.40 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.63/2.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.63/2.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.63/2.40 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 8.63/2.40 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.63/2.40 #
% 8.63/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 8.63/2.40
% 8.63/2.40 # Proof found!
% 8.63/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.63/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.63/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.63/2.40
% 8.63/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.63/2.40 # User time : 0.031 s
% 8.63/2.40 # System time : 0.006 s
% 8.63/2.40 # Total time : 0.038 s
% 8.63/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.63/2.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------