TSTP Solution File: NUM584+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUM584+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:19:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.22s 2.43s
% Output : Refutation 2.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11 % Problem : NUM584+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 16:02:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Thu Jul 7 16:02:24 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11274.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 139 during input processing: 0 [] {-} xK!=sz00.
% 0.12/0.36 155 back subsumes 154.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 211 during input processing: 0 [copy,211,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 181.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 165.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 160.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 159.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 157.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 153.
% 0.12/0.36 211 back subsumes 147.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.67/0.89 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.67/0.89 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.67/0.89 number of clauses in intial UL: 171
% 0.67/0.89 number of clauses initially in problem: 200
% 0.67/0.89 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 0.67/0.89 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 96
% 0.67/0.89 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.67/0.89 absolute distinct symbol count: 56
% 0.67/0.89 distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.67/0.89 distinct function count: 35
% 0.67/0.89 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89
% 0.67/0.89 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.75/1.94 Changing weight limit from 60 to 30.
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.75/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 45 givens.
% 1.75/1.94
% 2.18/2.38
% 2.18/2.38
% 2.18/2.38 Changing weight limit from 30 to 26.
% 2.18/2.38
% 2.18/2.38 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 50 givens.
% 2.18/2.38
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.22/2.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.22/2.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.06 sec ----> 7648 [binary,7647.1,146.1] {-} $F.
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.22/2.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.22/2.43 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 7 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aSubsetOf0(B,A)|aSet0(B).
% 2.22/2.43 95 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aElementOf0(B,szNzAzT0)|C!=slbdtsldtrb0(A,B)|aElementOf0(D,C)| -aSubsetOf0(D,A)|sbrdtbr0(D)!=B.
% 2.22/2.43 146 [] {+} -aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))),slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xK)).
% 2.22/2.43 183 [] {-} aSet0(szNzAzT0).
% 2.22/2.43 190 [] {-} aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0).
% 2.22/2.43 191 [] {-} aSubsetOf0(xS,szNzAzT0).
% 2.22/2.43 208 [] {-} sbrdtbr0(sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))))=xK.
% 2.22/2.43 210 [] {-} aSubsetOf0(sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))),xS).
% 2.22/2.43 211 [] {-} A=A.
% 2.22/2.43 1325 [hyper,191,7,183] {-} aSet0(xS).
% 2.22/2.43 7647 [hyper,210,95,1325,190,211,208] {-} aElementOf0(sdtpldt0(xQ,szmzizndt0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,xi))),slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xK)).
% 2.22/2.43 7648 [binary,7647.1,146.1] {-} $F.
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.22/2.43 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 ============ end of search ============
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.22/2.43
% 2.22/2.43 Process 11274 finished Thu Jul 7 16:02:26 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------