TSTP Solution File: NUM571+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM571+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:48:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 44.72s 6.78s
% Output   : Proof 56.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM571+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 12:57:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.21/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.21/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.21/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.21/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.21/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.21/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.21/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.21/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.21/0.61  
% 0.21/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.21/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.21/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 4.08/1.36  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.08/1.36  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.08/1.42  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.08/1.42  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.08/1.42  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.08/1.42  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.08/1.43  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 12.87/2.56  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 13.23/2.58  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.23/2.58  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.23/2.62  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 14.40/2.85  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 18.02/3.26  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.77/3.46  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 44.72/6.77  Prover 6: proved (6137ms)
% 44.72/6.77  
% 44.72/6.78  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 44.72/6.78  
% 44.72/6.78  Prover 3: stopped
% 44.72/6.78  Prover 5: stopped
% 44.72/6.79  Prover 0: stopped
% 44.72/6.79  Prover 2: stopped
% 44.72/6.80  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 44.72/6.80  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 44.72/6.80  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 44.72/6.80  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 44.72/6.80  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 46.70/7.03  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 46.97/7.06  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 46.97/7.07  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 46.97/7.08  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 46.97/7.08  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 47.83/7.38  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 47.83/7.39  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 50.07/7.49  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 50.07/7.52  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 50.07/7.54  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 50.72/7.57  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 55.50/8.23  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 56.50/8.32  Prover 10: Found proof (size 37)
% 56.50/8.32  Prover 10: proved (1531ms)
% 56.50/8.32  Prover 13: stopped
% 56.50/8.32  Prover 8: stopped
% 56.50/8.32  Prover 1: stopped
% 56.50/8.32  Prover 4: stopped
% 56.50/8.33  Prover 11: stopped
% 56.50/8.33  Prover 7: stopped
% 56.50/8.33  
% 56.50/8.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 56.50/8.33  
% 56.50/8.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 56.50/8.34  Assumptions after simplification:
% 56.50/8.34  ---------------------------------
% 56.50/8.34  
% 56.50/8.34    (m__)
% 56.74/8.36    $i(xi) & $i(xN) & $i(szNzAzT0) &  ? [v0: $i] : (sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = v0 &
% 56.74/8.36      $i(v0) & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(v0, szNzAzT0) |  ~ isCountable0(v0)))
% 56.74/8.36  
% 56.74/8.36    (m__3435)
% 56.74/8.36    $i(xS) & $i(szNzAzT0) & aSubsetOf0(xS, szNzAzT0) & isCountable0(xS)
% 56.74/8.36  
% 56.74/8.36    (m__3623)
% 56.74/8.36    sdtlpdtrp0(xN, sz00) = xS & szDzozmdt0(xN) = szNzAzT0 & $i(xN) & $i(xS) &
% 56.74/8.36    $i(sz00) & $i(szNzAzT0) & aFunction0(xN) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 56.74/8.36      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(xN, v0) = v1) |  ~ (szmzizndt0(v1) = v2)
% 56.74/8.36      |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aSubsetOf0(v1, szNzAzT0) |  ~
% 56.74/8.36      isCountable0(v1) |  ~ aElementOf0(v0, szNzAzT0) |  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i]
% 56.74/8.36      : (sdtlpdtrp0(xN, v4) = v5 & szszuzczcdt0(v0) = v4 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) &
% 56.74/8.37        aSubsetOf0(v5, v3) & isCountable0(v5)))
% 56.74/8.37  
% 56.74/8.37    (m__3702_02)
% 56.74/8.37    $i(xi) & $i(xN) & $i(sz00) & $i(szNzAzT0) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ?
% 56.74/8.37    [v2: $i] : ($i(v1) & (xi = sz00 | (v2 = xi & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = v0 &
% 56.74/8.37          szszuzczcdt0(v1) = xi & $i(v0) & aSubsetOf0(v0, szNzAzT0) &
% 56.74/8.37          isCountable0(v0) & aElementOf0(v1, szNzAzT0))))
% 56.74/8.37  
% 56.74/8.37    (function-axioms)
% 56.74/8.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 56.74/8.38      (sdtexdt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtexdt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 56.74/8.38    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtlcdtrc0(v3, v2) = v1)
% 56.74/8.38      |  ~ (sdtlcdtrc0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : 
% 56.74/8.38    ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtlbdtrb0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtlbdtrb0(v3, v2)
% 56.74/8.38        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 56.74/8.38      |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 56.74/8.38    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (slbdtsldtrb0(v3,
% 56.74/8.38          v2) = v1) |  ~ (slbdtsldtrb0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 56.74/8.38    :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 56.74/8.38      (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 56.74/8.38      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 56.74/8.38    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szDzizrdt0(v2) = v1) |
% 56.74/8.38       ~ (szDzizrdt0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 56.74/8.38      v0 |  ~ (szDzozmdt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szDzozmdt0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 56.74/8.38    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (slbdtrb0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (slbdtrb0(v2)
% 56.74/8.38        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 56.74/8.38      (szmzazxdt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szmzazxdt0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 56.74/8.38      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szmzizndt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szmzizndt0(v2)
% 56.74/8.38        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 56.74/8.38      (sbrdtbr0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (sbrdtbr0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 56.74/8.38    ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szszuzczcdt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szszuzczcdt0(v2) =
% 56.74/8.38        v0))
% 56.74/8.38  
% 56.74/8.38  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 56.74/8.38  --------------------------------------------
% 56.74/8.38  mCConsSet, mCDiffSet, mCardCons, mCardDiff, mCardEmpty, mCardNum, mCardS,
% 56.74/8.38  mCardSeg, mCardSub, mCardSubEx, mCntRel, mConsDiff, mCountNFin, mCountNFin_01,
% 56.74/8.38  mDefCons, mDefDiff, mDefEmp, mDefMax, mDefMin, mDefPtt, mDefRst, mDefSImg,
% 56.74/8.38  mDefSeg, mDefSel, mDefSub, mDiffCons, mDirichlet, mDomSet, mEOfElem, mElmSort,
% 56.74/8.38  mEmpFin, mFConsSet, mFDiffSet, mFinRel, mFinSubSeg, mFunSort, mIH, mIHSort,
% 56.74/8.38  mImgCount, mImgElm, mImgRng, mLessASymm, mLessRefl, mLessRel, mLessSucc,
% 56.74/8.38  mLessTotal, mLessTrans, mMinMin, mNATSet, mNatExtra, mNatNSucc, mNoScLessZr,
% 56.74/8.38  mPttSet, mSegFin, mSegLess, mSegSucc, mSegZero, mSelCSet, mSelExtra, mSelFSet,
% 56.74/8.38  mSelNSet, mSelSub, mSetSort, mSubASymm, mSubFSet, mSubRefl, mSubTrans,
% 56.74/8.38  mSuccEquSucc, mSuccLess, mSuccNum, mZeroLess, mZeroNum, m__3291, m__3398,
% 56.74/8.38  m__3418, m__3453, m__3462, m__3520, m__3533, m__3671, m__3702
% 56.74/8.38  
% 56.74/8.38  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 56.74/8.38  ---------------------------------
% 56.74/8.38  
% 56.74/8.38  Begin of proof
% 56.74/8.38  | 
% 56.74/8.38  | ALPHA: (m__3435) implies:
% 56.74/8.38  |   (1)  isCountable0(xS)
% 56.74/8.38  |   (2)  aSubsetOf0(xS, szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.38  | 
% 56.74/8.38  | ALPHA: (m__3623) implies:
% 56.74/8.38  |   (3)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, sz00) = xS
% 56.74/8.38  | 
% 56.74/8.38  | ALPHA: (m__3702_02) implies:
% 56.74/8.38  |   (4)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v1) & (xi = sz00 | (v2 =
% 56.74/8.38  |              xi & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = v0 & szszuzczcdt0(v1) = xi & $i(v0) &
% 56.74/8.38  |              aSubsetOf0(v0, szNzAzT0) & isCountable0(v0) & aElementOf0(v1,
% 56.74/8.38  |                szNzAzT0))))
% 56.74/8.38  | 
% 56.74/8.38  | ALPHA: (m__) implies:
% 56.74/8.38  |   (5)   ? [v0: $i] : (sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = v0 & $i(v0) & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(v0,
% 56.74/8.38  |              szNzAzT0) |  ~ isCountable0(v0)))
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 56.74/8.39  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 56.74/8.39  |          (sdtlpdtrp0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v3, v2) = v0))
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | DELTA: instantiating (5) with fresh symbol all_67_0 gives:
% 56.74/8.39  |   (7)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_67_0 & $i(all_67_0) & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(all_67_0,
% 56.74/8.39  |            szNzAzT0) |  ~ isCountable0(all_67_0))
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | ALPHA: (7) implies:
% 56.74/8.39  |   (8)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_67_0
% 56.74/8.39  |   (9)   ~ aSubsetOf0(all_67_0, szNzAzT0) |  ~ isCountable0(all_67_0)
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | DELTA: instantiating (4) with fresh symbols all_71_0, all_71_1, all_71_2
% 56.74/8.39  |        gives:
% 56.74/8.39  |   (10)  $i(all_71_1) & (xi = sz00 | (all_71_0 = xi & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) =
% 56.74/8.39  |             all_71_2 & szszuzczcdt0(all_71_1) = xi & $i(all_71_2) &
% 56.74/8.39  |             aSubsetOf0(all_71_2, szNzAzT0) & isCountable0(all_71_2) &
% 56.74/8.39  |             aElementOf0(all_71_1, szNzAzT0)))
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | ALPHA: (10) implies:
% 56.74/8.39  |   (11)  xi = sz00 | (all_71_0 = xi & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_71_2 &
% 56.74/8.39  |           szszuzczcdt0(all_71_1) = xi & $i(all_71_2) & aSubsetOf0(all_71_2,
% 56.74/8.39  |             szNzAzT0) & isCountable0(all_71_2) & aElementOf0(all_71_1,
% 56.74/8.39  |             szNzAzT0))
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | BETA: splitting (9) gives:
% 56.74/8.39  | 
% 56.74/8.39  | Case 1:
% 56.74/8.39  | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | |   (12)   ~ aSubsetOf0(all_67_0, szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.39  | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | BETA: splitting (11) gives:
% 56.74/8.39  | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | Case 1:
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | |   (13)  xi = sz00
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | | REDUCE: (8), (13) imply:
% 56.74/8.39  | | |   (14)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, sz00) = all_67_0
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with xS, all_67_0, sz00, xN, simplifying
% 56.74/8.39  | | |              with (3), (14) gives:
% 56.74/8.39  | | |   (15)  all_67_0 = xS
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | | REDUCE: (12), (15) imply:
% 56.74/8.39  | | |   (16)   ~ aSubsetOf0(xS, szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | | PRED_UNIFY: (2), (16) imply:
% 56.74/8.39  | | |   (17)  $false
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | | CLOSE: (17) is inconsistent.
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | Case 2:
% 56.74/8.39  | | | 
% 56.74/8.39  | | |   (18)  all_71_0 = xi & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_71_2 &
% 56.74/8.39  | | |         szszuzczcdt0(all_71_1) = xi & $i(all_71_2) & aSubsetOf0(all_71_2,
% 56.74/8.39  | | |           szNzAzT0) & isCountable0(all_71_2) & aElementOf0(all_71_1,
% 56.74/8.39  | | |           szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | ALPHA: (18) implies:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (19)  aSubsetOf0(all_71_2, szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (20)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_71_2
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_67_0, all_71_2, xi, xN,
% 56.74/8.40  | | |              simplifying with (8), (20) gives:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (21)  all_71_2 = all_67_0
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | REDUCE: (19), (21) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (22)  aSubsetOf0(all_67_0, szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | PRED_UNIFY: (12), (22) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (23)  $false
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | CLOSE: (23) is inconsistent.
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | End of split
% 56.74/8.40  | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | Case 2:
% 56.74/8.40  | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | |   (24)   ~ isCountable0(all_67_0)
% 56.74/8.40  | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | BETA: splitting (11) gives:
% 56.74/8.40  | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | Case 1:
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (25)  xi = sz00
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | REDUCE: (8), (25) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (26)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, sz00) = all_67_0
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with xS, all_67_0, sz00, xN, simplifying
% 56.74/8.40  | | |              with (3), (26) gives:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (27)  all_67_0 = xS
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | REDUCE: (24), (27) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (28)   ~ isCountable0(xS)
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (28) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (29)  $false
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | CLOSE: (29) is inconsistent.
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | Case 2:
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (30)  all_71_0 = xi & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_71_2 &
% 56.74/8.40  | | |         szszuzczcdt0(all_71_1) = xi & $i(all_71_2) & aSubsetOf0(all_71_2,
% 56.74/8.40  | | |           szNzAzT0) & isCountable0(all_71_2) & aElementOf0(all_71_1,
% 56.74/8.40  | | |           szNzAzT0)
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (31)  isCountable0(all_71_2)
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (32)  sdtlpdtrp0(xN, xi) = all_71_2
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_67_0, all_71_2, xi, xN,
% 56.74/8.40  | | |              simplifying with (8), (32) gives:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (33)  all_71_2 = all_67_0
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | REDUCE: (31), (33) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (34)  isCountable0(all_67_0)
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | PRED_UNIFY: (24), (34) imply:
% 56.74/8.40  | | |   (35)  $false
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | | CLOSE: (35) is inconsistent.
% 56.74/8.40  | | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | | End of split
% 56.74/8.40  | | 
% 56.74/8.40  | End of split
% 56.74/8.40  | 
% 56.74/8.40  End of proof
% 56.74/8.40  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 56.74/8.40  
% 56.74/8.40  7792ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------