%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM568+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:37:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.46s 2.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   7 unt;   4 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (  11 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_50,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | szszuzczcdt0(esk5_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cluhtmih/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_147,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cluhtmih/lgb.p',i_0_147) ).

cnf(i_0_158,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cluhtmih/lgb.p',i_0_158) ).

cnf(i_0_159,negated_conjecture,
    ( szszuzczcdt0(X1) != xK
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cluhtmih/lgb.p',i_0_159) ).

cnf(i_0_51,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | aElementOf0(esk5_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cluhtmih/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(c_0_165,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | szszuzczcdt0(esk5_1(X1)) = X1
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_166,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
    i_0_147 ).

cnf(c_0_167,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    i_0_158 ).

cnf(c_0_168,negated_conjecture,
    ( szszuzczcdt0(X1) != xK
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    i_0_159 ).

cnf(c_0_169,hypothesis,
    szszuzczcdt0(esk5_1(xK)) = xK,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_165,c_0_166]),c_0_167]) ).

cnf(c_0_170,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | aElementOf0(esk5_1(X1),szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_171,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(esk5_1(xK),szNzAzT0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_168,c_0_169]) ).

cnf(c_0_172,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_170,c_0_166]),c_0_167]),c_0_171]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NUM568+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 08:35:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.46/2.29  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.46/2.29  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.46/2.29  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.46/2.29  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S4S
% 7.46/2.29  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
% 7.46/2.29  #
% 7.46/2.29  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.46/2.29  
% 7.46/2.29  # Proof found!
% 7.46/2.29  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.46/2.29  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.46/2.29  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.46/2.29  
% 7.46/2.29  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.46/2.29  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 7.46/2.29  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 7.46/2.29  # Total time               : 0.032 s
% 7.46/2.29  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.46/2.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------