TSTP Solution File: NUM561+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM561+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:56:21 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   78 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   39 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  101 (  43   ~;  44   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn;  16   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDefSImg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aFunction0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( X3 = sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
            <=> ( aSet0(X3)
                & ! [X4] :
                    ( aElementOf0(X4,X3)
                  <=> ? [X5] :
                        ( aElementOf0(X5,X2)
                        & sdtlpdtrp0(X1,X5) = X4 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p',mDefSImg) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p',m__) ).

fof(mDomSet,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aFunction0(X1)
     => aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p',mDomSet) ).

fof(m__2911,hypothesis,
    aFunction0(xF),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p',m__2911) ).

fof(m__2911_02,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p',m__2911_02) ).

fof(mSubRefl,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => aSubsetOf0(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p',mSubRefl) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X12,X13,X14,X16] :
      ( ( aSet0(X9)
        | X9 != sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk1_4(X7,X8,X9,X10),X8)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X10,X9)
        | X9 != sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) )
      & ( sdtlpdtrp0(X7,esk1_4(X7,X8,X9,X10)) = X10
        | ~ aElementOf0(X10,X9)
        | X9 != sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X13,X8)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X7,X13) != X12
        | aElementOf0(X12,X9)
        | X9 != sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(esk2_3(X7,X8,X14),X14)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X16,X8)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X7,X16) != esk2_3(X7,X8,X14)
        | ~ aSet0(X14)
        | X14 = sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) )
      & ( aElementOf0(esk3_3(X7,X8,X14),X8)
        | aElementOf0(esk2_3(X7,X8,X14),X14)
        | ~ aSet0(X14)
        | X14 = sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) )
      & ( sdtlpdtrp0(X7,esk3_3(X7,X8,X14)) = esk2_3(X7,X8,X14)
        | aElementOf0(esk2_3(X7,X8,X14),X14)
        | ~ aSet0(X14)
        | X14 = sdtlcdtrc0(X7,X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X8,szDzozmdt0(X7))
        | ~ aFunction0(X7) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSImg])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(X4,X5)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | sdtlpdtrp0(X3,X1) != X4
    | X5 != sdtlcdtrc0(X3,X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X3))
    | ~ aFunction0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X6] :
      ( ~ aFunction0(X6)
      | aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDomSet])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(X1,X2),sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X3))
    | ~ aFunction0(X1)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X3,szDzozmdt0(X1))
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aFunction0(xF),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2911]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2911_02]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X27] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X27)
      | aSubsetOf0(X27,X27) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSubRefl])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X1))
    | ~ aFunction0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(szDzozmdt0(xF),szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( aSubsetOf0(X1,X1)
    | ~ aSet0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    aSet0(szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : NUM561+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 13:47:38 EDT 2023
% 0.22/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kgG2EiWNQj/E---3.1_10882.p
% 0.22/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # new_bool_3 with pid 10964 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 10968 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.51  # Search class: FGUSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.51  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 71
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.22/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.22/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
% 0.22/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 46
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 46
% 0.22/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.22/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 18
% 0.22/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.22/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.22/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 0.22/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 0.22/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.22/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.22/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.22/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.22/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 52
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.22/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 113
% 0.22/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.22/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.22/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.22/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2970
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
% 0.22/0.51  
% 0.22/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
% 0.22/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------