TSTP Solution File: NUM559+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM559+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.91s 1.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   42
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (   5 unt;  40 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    5 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   56 (  31   >;  25   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   32 (  32 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdtlseqdt0 > iLess0 > aSubsetOf0 > aElementOf0 > isFinite0 > isCountable0 > aSet0 > aElement0 > slbdtsldtrb0 > sdtpldt0 > sdtmndt0 > #nlpp > szszuzczcdt0 > szmzizndt0 > szmzazxdt0 > slbdtrb0 > sbrdtbr0 > xy > xx > xk > xT > xS > xQ > szNzAzT0 > sz00 > slcrc0 > #skF_7 > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_1 > #skF_4 > #skF_12 > #skF_5 > #skF_10 > #skF_8 > #skF_15 > #skF_13 > #skF_14 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_9

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(xk,type,
    xk: $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sbrdtbr0,type,
    sbrdtbr0: $i > $i ).

tff(aSet0,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

tff(szszuzczcdt0,type,
    szszuzczcdt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sdtmndt0,type,
    sdtmndt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff(szNzAzT0,type,
    szNzAzT0: $i ).

tff(sdtlseqdt0,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xS,type,
    xS: $i ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xy,type,
    xy: $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(slbdtsldtrb0,type,
    slbdtsldtrb0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xx,type,
    xx: $i ).

tff(aSubsetOf0,type,
    aSubsetOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(isCountable0,type,
    isCountable0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xT,type,
    xT: $i ).

tff(aElementOf0,type,
    aElementOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(slcrc0,type,
    slcrc0: $i ).

tff(isFinite0,type,
    isFinite0: $i > $o ).

tff(xQ,type,
    xQ: $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(szmzizndt0,type,
    szmzizndt0: $i > $i ).

tff(szmzazxdt0,type,
    szmzazxdt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(slbdtrb0,type,
    slbdtrb0: $i > $i ).

tff(f_545,hypothesis,
    ~ ~ aElementOf0(xx,xQ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2338) ).

tff(f_542,hypothesis,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xQ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2323) ).

tff(c_280,plain,
    aElementOf0(xx,xQ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_545]) ).

tff(c_278,plain,
    ~ aElementOf0(xx,xQ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_542]) ).

tff(c_284,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_280,c_278]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : NUM559+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:15:38 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.91/1.91  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/1.91  
% 3.91/1.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.91/1.93  
% 3.91/1.93  Inference rules
% 3.91/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.91/1.93  #Ref     : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #Sup     : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #Fact    : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #Define  : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #Split   : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #Chain   : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #Close   : 0
% 3.91/1.93  
% 3.91/1.93  Ordering : KBO
% 3.91/1.93  
% 3.91/1.93  Simplification rules
% 3.91/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.91/1.93  #Subsume      : 134
% 3.91/1.93  #Demod        : 1
% 3.91/1.93  #Tautology    : 6
% 3.91/1.93  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.91/1.93  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.91/1.94  
% 3.91/1.94  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.91/1.94  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.91/1.94  
% 3.91/1.94  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.91/1.94  ----------------------
% 3.91/1.94  Preprocessing        : 0.75
% 3.91/1.94  Parsing              : 0.37
% 3.91/1.94  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 3.91/1.94  Main loop            : 0.06
% 3.91/1.94  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 3.91/1.94  Reduction            : 0.02
% 3.91/1.94  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 3.91/1.94  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 3.91/1.94  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 3.91/1.94  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.91/1.94  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.91/1.94  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.91/1.94  Total                : 0.85
% 3.91/1.94  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.91/1.94  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.91/1.94  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.91/1.94  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------