TSTP Solution File: NUM557+3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM557+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:56:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 11 ~; 9 |; 9 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn; 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ( ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xP)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
| aSubsetOf0(xP,xS) )
& sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk )
| aElementOf0(xP,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.V7caULEeEG/E---3.1_28401.p',m__) ).
fof(m__2431,hypothesis,
( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xP)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
& aSubsetOf0(xP,xS)
& sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.V7caULEeEG/E---3.1_28401.p',m__2431) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xP)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
| aSubsetOf0(xP,xS) )
& sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk )
| aElementOf0(xP,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ( aElementOf0(esk16_0,xP)
| sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(esk16_0,xS)
| sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk )
& ( ~ aSubsetOf0(xP,xS)
| sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk )
& ~ aElementOf0(xP,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
! [X141] :
( ( ~ aElementOf0(X141,xP)
| aElementOf0(X141,xS) )
& aSubsetOf0(xP,xS)
& sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__2431])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aSubsetOf0(xP,xS)
| sbrdtbr0(xP) != xk ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sbrdtbr0(xP) = xk,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
aSubsetOf0(xP,xS),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ aSubsetOf0(xP,xS),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : NUM557+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:05:36 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.V7caULEeEG/E---3.1_28401.p
% 0.22/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 28479 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 28485 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52 # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 73
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses : 178
% 0.22/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.22/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 172
% 0.22/0.52 # Processed clauses : 5
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.22/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 167
% 0.22/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 557
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10158
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 2296 pages
% 0.22/0.52
% 0.22/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.52 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.22/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------