TSTP Solution File: NUM550+3 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : NUM550+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:48:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 15.70s 2.85s
% Output : Proof 26.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : NUM550+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.08/0.30 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.30 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 13:29:57 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.58 ________ _____
% 0.15/0.58 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.15/0.58 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.15/0.58 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.15/0.58 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.15/0.58
% 0.15/0.58 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.15/0.58 (2023-06-19)
% 0.15/0.58
% 0.15/0.58 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.15/0.58 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.15/0.58 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.15/0.58 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.15/0.58
% 0.15/0.58 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.15/0.58
% 0.15/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.59/0.60 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.68/0.61 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 4.15/1.36 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 4.15/1.36 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.62/1.41 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.62/1.41 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.62/1.41 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.62/1.41 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.62/1.41 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 14.93/2.73 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.93/2.76 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.93/2.78 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.70/2.84 Prover 2: proved (2206ms)
% 15.70/2.84
% 15.70/2.85 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 15.70/2.85
% 15.70/2.86 Prover 3: stopped
% 15.70/2.87 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 15.70/2.91 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 16.25/2.94 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 16.25/2.95 Prover 5: stopped
% 16.25/2.98 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 16.96/3.01 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 16.96/3.02 Prover 6: stopped
% 16.96/3.03 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 16.96/3.07 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 17.64/3.13 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 18.37/3.19 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 18.56/3.28 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 21.61/3.62 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.61/3.65 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 21.61/3.65 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.15/3.76 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 22.87/3.77 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.87/3.77 Prover 0: stopped
% 22.87/3.78 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.87/3.79 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 23.36/3.84 Prover 10: Found proof (size 12)
% 23.36/3.84 Prover 10: proved (865ms)
% 23.36/3.84 Prover 4: stopped
% 23.36/3.84 Prover 8: stopped
% 23.36/3.84 Prover 1: stopped
% 23.36/3.84 Prover 7: stopped
% 23.36/3.90 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 24.23/3.99 Prover 13: stopped
% 25.99/4.37 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 26.20/4.42 Prover 11: stopped
% 26.20/4.42
% 26.20/4.42 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 26.20/4.42
% 26.20/4.42 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 26.20/4.43 Assumptions after simplification:
% 26.20/4.43 ---------------------------------
% 26.20/4.43
% 26.20/4.43 (mCardEmpty)
% 26.34/4.47 $i(sz00) & $i(slcrc0) & ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = sz00 | ~ (sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = v0)
% 26.34/4.48 | ~ aSet0(slcrc0)) & ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = slcrc0 | ~ (sbrdtbr0(v0) = sz00)
% 26.34/4.48 | ~ $i(v0) | ~ aSet0(v0))
% 26.34/4.48
% 26.34/4.48 (m__)
% 26.34/4.48 xQ = slcrc0 & $i(slcrc0) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ aElementOf0(v0,
% 26.34/4.48 slcrc0))
% 26.34/4.48
% 26.34/4.48 (m__2202_02)
% 26.34/4.48 ~ (xk = sz00) & $i(xT) & $i(xS) & $i(xk) & $i(sz00) & aSet0(xT) & aSet0(xS)
% 26.34/4.48
% 26.34/4.48 (m__2270)
% 26.34/4.48 $i(xQ) & $i(xS) & $i(xk) & ? [v0: $i] : (slbdtsldtrb0(xS, xk) = v0 &
% 26.34/4.48 sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk & $i(v0) & aSubsetOf0(xQ, xS) & aElementOf0(xQ, v0) &
% 26.34/4.48 aSet0(xQ) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ aElementOf0(v1, xQ) |
% 26.34/4.48 aElementOf0(v1, xS)))
% 26.34/4.48
% 26.34/4.48 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 26.34/4.48 --------------------------------------------
% 26.34/4.48 mCConsSet, mCDiffSet, mCardCons, mCardDiff, mCardNum, mCardS, mCardSeg,
% 26.34/4.48 mCardSub, mCardSubEx, mCntRel, mConsDiff, mCountNFin, mCountNFin_01, mDefCons,
% 26.34/4.49 mDefDiff, mDefEmp, mDefMax, mDefMin, mDefSeg, mDefSel, mDefSub, mDiffCons,
% 26.34/4.49 mEOfElem, mElmSort, mEmpFin, mFConsSet, mFDiffSet, mFinRel, mFinSubSeg, mIH,
% 26.34/4.49 mIHSort, mLessASymm, mLessRefl, mLessRel, mLessSucc, mLessTotal, mLessTrans,
% 26.34/4.49 mMinMin, mNATSet, mNatExtra, mNatNSucc, mNoScLessZr, mSegFin, mSegLess,
% 26.34/4.49 mSegSucc, mSegZero, mSelCSet, mSelFSet, mSelNSet, mSetSort, mSubASymm, mSubFSet,
% 26.34/4.49 mSubRefl, mSubTrans, mSuccEquSucc, mSuccLess, mSuccNum, mZeroLess, mZeroNum,
% 26.34/4.49 m__2202, m__2227, m__2256, m__2291
% 26.34/4.49
% 26.34/4.49 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 26.34/4.49 ---------------------------------
% 26.34/4.49
% 26.34/4.49 Begin of proof
% 26.34/4.49 |
% 26.34/4.49 | ALPHA: (mCardEmpty) implies:
% 26.34/4.49 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : (v0 = sz00 | ~ (sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = v0) | ~
% 26.34/4.49 | aSet0(slcrc0))
% 26.34/4.49 |
% 26.34/4.49 | ALPHA: (m__2202_02) implies:
% 26.34/4.49 | (2) ~ (xk = sz00)
% 26.34/4.49 |
% 26.34/4.49 | ALPHA: (m__2270) implies:
% 26.34/4.49 | (3) ? [v0: $i] : (slbdtsldtrb0(xS, xk) = v0 & sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk & $i(v0) &
% 26.34/4.49 | aSubsetOf0(xQ, xS) & aElementOf0(xQ, v0) & aSet0(xQ) & ! [v1: $i] :
% 26.34/4.49 | ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ aElementOf0(v1, xQ) | aElementOf0(v1, xS)))
% 26.34/4.49 |
% 26.34/4.49 | ALPHA: (m__) implies:
% 26.34/4.50 | (4) xQ = slcrc0
% 26.34/4.50 |
% 26.34/4.50 | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbol all_54_0 gives:
% 26.34/4.50 | (5) slbdtsldtrb0(xS, xk) = all_54_0 & sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk & $i(all_54_0) &
% 26.34/4.50 | aSubsetOf0(xQ, xS) & aElementOf0(xQ, all_54_0) & aSet0(xQ) & ! [v0:
% 26.34/4.50 | $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ aElementOf0(v0, xQ) | aElementOf0(v0, xS))
% 26.34/4.50 |
% 26.34/4.50 | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 26.34/4.50 | (6) aSet0(xQ)
% 26.34/4.50 | (7) sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk
% 26.34/4.50 |
% 26.34/4.50 | REDUCE: (4), (7) imply:
% 26.34/4.50 | (8) sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = xk
% 26.34/4.50 |
% 26.34/4.50 | REDUCE: (4), (6) imply:
% 26.34/4.50 | (9) aSet0(slcrc0)
% 26.34/4.50 |
% 26.34/4.50 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with xk, simplifying with (8), (9) gives:
% 26.34/4.50 | (10) xk = sz00
% 26.34/4.50 |
% 26.34/4.51 | REDUCE: (2), (10) imply:
% 26.34/4.51 | (11) $false
% 26.34/4.51 |
% 26.34/4.51 | CLOSE: (11) is inconsistent.
% 26.34/4.51 |
% 26.34/4.51 End of proof
% 26.34/4.51 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 26.34/4.51
% 26.34/4.51 3923ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------