TSTP Solution File: NUM550+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : NUM550+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:07:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  15   ~;   7   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn;   5   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
      & xQ = slcrc0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qTvXNe3fZV/E---3.1_10904.p',m__) ).

fof(m__2270,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xQ)
    & ! [X1] :
        ( aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
       => aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
    & aSubsetOf0(xQ,xS)
    & sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk
    & aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qTvXNe3fZV/E---3.1_10904.p',m__2270) ).

fof(mCardEmpty,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
      <=> X1 = slcrc0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qTvXNe3fZV/E---3.1_10904.p',mCardEmpty) ).

fof(m__2202_02,hypothesis,
    ( aSet0(xS)
    & aSet0(xT)
    & xk != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qTvXNe3fZV/E---3.1_10904.p',m__2202_02) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
        & xQ = slcrc0 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    ! [X137] :
      ( aSet0(xQ)
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X137,xQ)
        | aElementOf0(X137,xS) )
      & aSubsetOf0(xQ,xS)
      & sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk
      & aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__2270])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X138] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0(X138,xQ)
      & xQ = slcrc0 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X74] :
      ( ( sbrdtbr0(X74) != sz00
        | X74 = slcrc0
        | ~ aSet0(X74) )
      & ( X74 != slcrc0
        | sbrdtbr0(X74) = sz00
        | ~ aSet0(X74) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mCardEmpty])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xQ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
    | X1 != slcrc0
    | ~ aSet0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = xk,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aSet0(slcrc0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    xk != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2202_02]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : NUM550+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:25:21 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.51  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.qTvXNe3fZV/E---3.1_10904.p
% 0.22/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 10982 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with pid 10993 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.53  # Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_110_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 67
% 0.22/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 152
% 0.22/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.22/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 146
% 0.22/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.22/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 24
% 0.22/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.22/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 4
% 0.22/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.22/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.22/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 16
% 0.22/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.22/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 0.22/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.22/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 120
% 0.22/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 478
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.22/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9220
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.53  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2260 pages
% 0.22/0.53  
% 0.22/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.53  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.22/0.53  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 0.22/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
% 0.22/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------