TSTP Solution File: NUM550+1 by leanCoP---2.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : leanCoP---2.2
% Problem : NUM550+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 11:41:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 29.35s 29.39s
% Output : Proof 29.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM550+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : leancop_casc.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 19:39:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 29.35/29.39 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.35/29.40 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.35/29.40
% 29.35/29.40 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 29.35/29.40 fof(mCardEmpty, axiom, ! [_96925] : (aSet0(_96925) => (sbrdtbr0(_96925) = sz00 <=> _96925 = slcrc0)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mCardEmpty)).
% 29.35/29.40 fof(m__, conjecture, (! xQ) = slcrc0, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__)).
% 29.35/29.40 fof(m__2202_02, hypothesis, aSet0(xS) & aSet0(xT) & (! xk) = sz00, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__2202_02)).
% 29.35/29.40 fof(m__2291, hypothesis, aSet0(xQ) & isFinite0(xQ) & sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__2291)).
% 29.35/29.40
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(1, plain, [-(26 ^ [_57170]), -(sbrdtbr0(_57170) = sz00), _57170 = slcrc0], clausify(mCardEmpty)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(2, plain, [-(xQ = slcrc0)], clausify(m__)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(3, plain, [_32181 = _32226, -(_32226 = _32181)], theory(equality)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(4, plain, [-(_32460 = _32571), _32460 = _32516, _32516 = _32571], theory(equality)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(5, plain, [aSet0(_57170), 26 ^ [_57170]], clausify(mCardEmpty)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(6, plain, [xk = sz00], clausify(m__2202_02)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(7, plain, [-(aSet0(xQ))], clausify(m__2291)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf(8, plain, [-(sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk)], clausify(m__2291)).
% 29.35/29.40
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1',plain,[-(xQ = slcrc0)],start(2)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1',plain,[xQ = slcrc0, -(26 ^ [xQ]), -(sbrdtbr0(xQ) = sz00)],extension(1,bind([[_57170], [xQ]]))).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1.1',plain,[26 ^ [xQ], aSet0(xQ)],extension(5,bind([[_57170], [xQ]]))).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1.1.1',plain,[-(aSet0(xQ))],extension(7)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1.2',plain,[sbrdtbr0(xQ) = sz00, -(xk = sz00), xk = sbrdtbr0(xQ)],extension(4,bind([[_32571, _32460, _32516], [sz00, xk, sbrdtbr0(xQ)]]))).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1.2.1',plain,[xk = sz00],extension(6)).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1.2.2',plain,[-(xk = sbrdtbr0(xQ)), sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk],extension(3,bind([[_32181, _32226], [sbrdtbr0(xQ), xk]]))).
% 29.35/29.40 cnf('1.1.2.2.1',plain,[-(sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk)],extension(8)).
% 29.35/29.40 %-----------------------------------------------------
% 29.35/29.41
% 29.35/29.41 % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------