TSTP Solution File: NUM550+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : NUM550+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n094.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.625MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan 8 15:21:45 EST 2018
% Result : Theorem 0.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 87 ( 36 ~; 30 |; 18 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(10,axiom,
( aSet0(xS)
& aSet0(xT)
& ~ equal(xk,sz00) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__2202_02) ).
fof(32,axiom,
! [X1] :
( equal(X1,slcrc0)
<=> ( aSet0(X1)
& ~ ? [X2] : aElementOf0(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',mDefEmp) ).
fof(43,conjecture,
~ equal(xQ,slcrc0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__) ).
fof(48,axiom,
( aSet0(xQ)
& isFinite0(xQ)
& equal(sbrdtbr0(xQ),xk) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__2291) ).
fof(50,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aSet0(X1)
=> ( equal(sbrdtbr0(X1),sz00)
<=> equal(X1,slcrc0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',mCardEmpty) ).
fof(68,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ equal(xQ,slcrc0),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[43]) ).
fof(73,negated_conjecture,
equal(xQ,slcrc0),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[68,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(113,plain,
xk != sz00,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
fof(207,plain,
! [X1] :
( ( ~ equal(X1,slcrc0)
| ( aSet0(X1)
& ! [X2] : ~ aElementOf0(X2,X1) ) )
& ( ~ aSet0(X1)
| ? [X2] : aElementOf0(X2,X1)
| equal(X1,slcrc0) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
fof(208,plain,
! [X3] :
( ( ~ equal(X3,slcrc0)
| ( aSet0(X3)
& ! [X4] : ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3) ) )
& ( ~ aSet0(X3)
| ? [X5] : aElementOf0(X5,X3)
| equal(X3,slcrc0) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[207]) ).
fof(209,plain,
! [X3] :
( ( ~ equal(X3,slcrc0)
| ( aSet0(X3)
& ! [X4] : ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3) ) )
& ( ~ aSet0(X3)
| aElementOf0(esk6_1(X3),X3)
| equal(X3,slcrc0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[208]) ).
fof(210,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
& aSet0(X3) )
| ~ equal(X3,slcrc0) )
& ( ~ aSet0(X3)
| aElementOf0(esk6_1(X3),X3)
| equal(X3,slcrc0) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[209]) ).
fof(211,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( ~ aElementOf0(X4,X3)
| ~ equal(X3,slcrc0) )
& ( aSet0(X3)
| ~ equal(X3,slcrc0) )
& ( ~ aSet0(X3)
| aElementOf0(esk6_1(X3),X3)
| equal(X3,slcrc0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[210]) ).
cnf(213,plain,
( aSet0(X1)
| X1 != slcrc0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[211]) ).
cnf(264,negated_conjecture,
xQ = slcrc0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[73]) ).
cnf(277,plain,
sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48]) ).
fof(292,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ aSet0(X1)
| ( ( ~ equal(sbrdtbr0(X1),sz00)
| equal(X1,slcrc0) )
& ( ~ equal(X1,slcrc0)
| equal(sbrdtbr0(X1),sz00) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[50]) ).
fof(293,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ aSet0(X2)
| ( ( ~ equal(sbrdtbr0(X2),sz00)
| equal(X2,slcrc0) )
& ( ~ equal(X2,slcrc0)
| equal(sbrdtbr0(X2),sz00) ) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[292]) ).
fof(294,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( ~ equal(sbrdtbr0(X2),sz00)
| equal(X2,slcrc0)
| ~ aSet0(X2) )
& ( ~ equal(X2,slcrc0)
| equal(sbrdtbr0(X2),sz00)
| ~ aSet0(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[293]) ).
cnf(295,plain,
( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
| ~ aSet0(X1)
| X1 != slcrc0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[294]) ).
cnf(358,plain,
sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = xk,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[277,264,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(368,plain,
( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
| slcrc0 != X1 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[295,213]) ).
cnf(369,plain,
sz00 = xk,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[358,368,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(371,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[369,113,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(372,plain,
$false,
371,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM550+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.22 % Computer : n094.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.22 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.22 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.22 % Memory : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.22 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.22 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.22 % DateTime : Fri Jan 5 08:26:45 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.22 % CPUTime :
% 0.02/0.27 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.27 --creating new selector for []
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.34 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp27jpNA/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.34 -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.34 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.34 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.34 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------