TSTP Solution File: NUM547+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUM547+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:19:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.50s 7.69s
% Output : Refutation 7.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM547+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 19:15:30 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Thu Jul 7 19:15:30 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 19591.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36 113 back subsumes 112.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 143 during input processing: 0 [copy,143,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36 143 back subsumes 123.
% 0.13/0.36 143 back subsumes 118.
% 0.13/0.36 143 back subsumes 117.
% 0.13/0.36 143 back subsumes 115.
% 0.13/0.36 143 back subsumes 111.
% 0.13/0.36 143 back subsumes 105.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.38/0.61 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.38/0.61 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.38/0.61 number of clauses in intial UL: 122
% 0.38/0.61 number of clauses initially in problem: 134
% 0.38/0.61 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 91
% 0.38/0.61 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.38/0.61 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.38/0.61 absolute distinct symbol count: 35
% 0.38/0.61 distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.38/0.61 distinct function count: 19
% 0.38/0.61 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61
% 0.38/0.61 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.29/4.50
% 4.29/4.50
% 4.29/4.50 Changing weight limit from 60 to 40.
% 4.29/4.50
% 4.29/4.50 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 40 givens.
% 4.29/4.50
% 5.57/5.81
% 5.57/5.81
% 5.57/5.81 Changing weight limit from 40 to 32.
% 5.57/5.81
% 5.57/5.81 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 45 givens.
% 5.57/5.81
% 6.36/6.54
% 6.36/6.54
% 6.36/6.54 Changing weight limit from 32 to 27.
% 6.36/6.54
% 6.36/6.54 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 50 givens.
% 6.36/6.54
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.66/6.88 Changing weight limit from 27 to 25.
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.66/6.88 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 55 givens.
% 6.66/6.88
% 6.98/7.16
% 6.98/7.16
% 6.98/7.16 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 6.98/7.16
% 6.98/7.16 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 60 givens.
% 6.98/7.16
% 7.28/7.53
% 7.28/7.53
% 7.28/7.53 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 7.28/7.53
% 7.28/7.53 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 65 givens.
% 7.28/7.53
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 -------- PROOF --------
% 7.50/7.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 7.50/7.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 7.30 sec ----> 11275 [hyper,1211,4,unit_del,103,104] {-} $F.
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.50/7.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 7.50/7.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 4 [] {+} A=slcrc0| -aSet0(A)|aElementOf0($f1(A),A).
% 7.50/7.69 92 [] {+} -aSet0(A)| -aElementOf0(B,szNzAzT0)|C!=slbdtsldtrb0(A,B)|aSet0(C).
% 7.50/7.69 103 [] {+} slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)!=slcrc0.
% 7.50/7.69 104 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)).
% 7.50/7.69 138 [] {-} aElementOf0(xk,szNzAzT0).
% 7.50/7.69 139 [] {-} aSet0(xS).
% 7.50/7.69 143 [] {-} A=A.
% 7.50/7.69 1211 [hyper,143,92,139,138] {-} aSet0(slbdtsldtrb0(xS,xk)).
% 7.50/7.69 11275 [hyper,1211,4,unit_del,103,104] {-} $F.
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.50/7.69 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 ============ end of search ============
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.50/7.69
% 7.50/7.69 Process 19591 finished Thu Jul 7 19:15:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------