TSTP Solution File: NUM540+2 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM540+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:52:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.59s 1.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   32
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   3 unt;  31 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    7 (   4   ~;   1   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   47 (  27   >;  20   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   23 (  23 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (;   2   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdtlseqdt0 > iLess0 > aSubsetOf0 > aElementOf0 > isFinite0 > isCountable0 > aSet0 > aElement0 > sdtpldt0 > sdtmndt0 > #nlpp > szszuzczcdt0 > szmzizndt0 > szmzazxdt0 > slbdtrb0 > sbrdtbr0 > szNzAzT0 > sz00 > slcrc0 > #skF_7 > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_1 > #skF_4 > #skF_12 > #skF_13 > #skF_5 > #skF_10 > #skF_8 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_9

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sbrdtbr0,type,
    sbrdtbr0: $i > $i ).

tff(aSet0,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

tff(szszuzczcdt0,type,
    szszuzczcdt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sdtmndt0,type,
    sdtmndt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff(szNzAzT0,type,
    szNzAzT0: $i ).

tff(sdtlseqdt0,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aSubsetOf0,type,
    aSubsetOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(isCountable0,type,
    isCountable0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aElementOf0,type,
    aElementOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(slcrc0,type,
    slcrc0: $i ).

tff(isFinite0,type,
    isFinite0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(szmzizndt0,type,
    szmzizndt0: $i > $i ).

tff(szmzazxdt0,type,
    szmzazxdt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(slbdtrb0,type,
    slbdtrb0: $i > $i ).

tff(f_451,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00))
        & ! [W0] : ~ aElementOf0(W0,slbdtrb0(sz00)) )
     => ( ~ ? [W0] : aElementOf0(W0,slbdtrb0(sz00))
        | ( slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(c_212,plain,
    ! [W0_144] : ~ aElementOf0(W0_144,slbdtrb0(sz00)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_451]) ).

tff(c_210,plain,
    aElementOf0('#skF_13',slbdtrb0(sz00)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_451]) ).

tff(c_215,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_210]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM540+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:31:31 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.59/1.79  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.59/1.80  
% 3.59/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.59/1.82  
% 3.59/1.82  Inference rules
% 3.59/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.59/1.82  #Ref     : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Sup     : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Fact    : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Define  : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Split   : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Chain   : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Close   : 0
% 3.59/1.82  
% 3.59/1.82  Ordering : KBO
% 3.59/1.82  
% 3.59/1.82  Simplification rules
% 3.59/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.59/1.82  #Subsume      : 100
% 3.59/1.82  #Demod        : 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Tautology    : 6
% 3.59/1.82  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.59/1.82  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.59/1.82  
% 3.59/1.82  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.59/1.82  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.59/1.82  
% 3.59/1.82  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.59/1.82  ----------------------
% 3.80/1.82  Preprocessing        : 0.71
% 3.80/1.82  Parsing              : 0.34
% 3.80/1.82  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 3.80/1.82  Main loop            : 0.06
% 3.80/1.82  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 3.80/1.82  Reduction            : 0.02
% 3.80/1.82  Demodulation         : 0.02
% 3.80/1.82  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 3.80/1.82  Subsumption          : 0.03
% 3.80/1.82  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.80/1.82  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.80/1.82  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.80/1.82  Total                : 0.81
% 3.80/1.82  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.80/1.82  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.80/1.82  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.80/1.82  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------