TSTP Solution File: NUM540+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUM540+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:19:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 15.06s 15.23s
% Output : Refutation 15.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : NUM540+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 21:48:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Tue Jul 5 21:48:44 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13944.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36 93 back subsumes 92.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 107 during input processing: 0 [copy,107,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36 107 back subsumes 98.
% 0.12/0.36 107 back subsumes 97.
% 0.12/0.36 107 back subsumes 95.
% 0.12/0.36 107 back subsumes 91.
% 0.12/0.36 107 back subsumes 85.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.64 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.64 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.64 number of clauses in intial UL: 94
% 0.46/0.64 number of clauses initially in problem: 99
% 0.46/0.64 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.46/0.64 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.46/0.64 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.46/0.64 absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.46/0.64 distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.46/0.64 distinct function count: 16
% 0.46/0.64 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64
% 0.46/0.64 =========== start of search ===========
% 3.44/3.66
% 3.44/3.66
% 3.44/3.66 Changing weight limit from 60 to 42.
% 3.44/3.66
% 3.44/3.66 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 35 givens.
% 3.44/3.66
% 4.42/4.66
% 4.42/4.66
% 4.42/4.66 Changing weight limit from 42 to 34.
% 4.42/4.66
% 4.42/4.66 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 40 givens.
% 4.42/4.66
% 5.33/5.56
% 5.33/5.56
% 5.33/5.56 Changing weight limit from 34 to 30.
% 5.33/5.56
% 5.33/5.56 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 45 givens.
% 5.33/5.56
% 6.03/6.28
% 6.03/6.28
% 6.03/6.28 Changing weight limit from 30 to 28.
% 6.03/6.28
% 6.03/6.28 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 50 givens.
% 6.03/6.28
% 6.54/6.77
% 6.54/6.77
% 6.54/6.77 Changing weight limit from 28 to 26.
% 6.54/6.77
% 6.54/6.77 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 55 givens.
% 6.54/6.77
% 6.93/7.17
% 6.93/7.17
% 6.93/7.17 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 6.93/7.17
% 6.93/7.17 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 60 givens.
% 6.93/7.17
% 7.31/7.52
% 7.31/7.52
% 7.31/7.52 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 7.31/7.52
% 7.31/7.52 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 65 givens.
% 7.31/7.52
% 7.76/7.96
% 7.76/7.96
% 7.76/7.96 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 7.76/7.96
% 7.76/7.96 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 70 givens.
% 7.76/7.96
% 8.32/8.51
% 8.32/8.51
% 8.32/8.51 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 8.32/8.51
% 8.32/8.51 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 75 givens.
% 8.32/8.51
% 8.52/8.73
% 8.52/8.73
% 8.52/8.73 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 8.52/8.73
% 8.52/8.73 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 80 givens.
% 8.52/8.73
% 9.05/9.24
% 9.05/9.24
% 9.05/9.24 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 9.05/9.24
% 9.05/9.24 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 95 givens.
% 9.05/9.24
% 9.74/9.99
% 9.74/9.99
% 9.74/9.99 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 9.74/9.99
% 9.74/9.99 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 110 givens.
% 9.74/9.99
% 10.22/10.40
% 10.22/10.40
% 10.22/10.40 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 10.22/10.40
% 10.22/10.40 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 120 givens.
% 10.22/10.40
% 10.44/10.60
% 10.44/10.60
% 10.44/10.60 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 10.44/10.60
% 10.44/10.60 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 125 givens.
% 10.44/10.60
% 10.74/10.96
% 10.74/10.96
% 10.74/10.96 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 10.74/10.96
% 10.74/10.96 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 140 givens.
% 10.74/10.96
% 11.05/11.28
% 11.05/11.28
% 11.05/11.28 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 11.05/11.28
% 11.05/11.28 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 155 givens.
% 11.05/11.28
% 11.42/11.68
% 11.42/11.68
% 11.42/11.68 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 11.42/11.68
% 11.42/11.68 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 170 givens.
% 11.42/11.68
% 12.02/12.20
% 12.02/12.20
% 12.02/12.20 Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 12.02/12.20
% 12.02/12.20 Resetting weight limit to 13 after 180 givens.
% 12.02/12.20
% 12.24/12.47
% 12.24/12.47
% 12.24/12.47 Changing weight limit from 13 to 12.
% 12.24/12.47
% 12.24/12.47 Resetting weight limit to 12 after 185 givens.
% 12.24/12.47
% 12.93/13.16
% 12.93/13.16
% 12.93/13.16 Changing weight limit from 12 to 11.
% 12.93/13.16
% 12.93/13.16 Resetting weight limit to 11 after 200 givens.
% 12.93/13.16
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 14.71 sec ----> 22242 [hyper,14511,48,14512] {-} $F.
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 3.
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 15.06/15.23 % SZS status Theorem
% 15.06/15.23 % SZS output start Refutation
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 4 [] {+} A=slcrc0| -aSet0(A)|aElementOf0($f1(A),A).
% 15.06/15.23 48 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,szNzAzT0)| -sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(A),sz00).
% 15.06/15.23 76 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,szNzAzT0)|B!=slbdtrb0(A)|aSet0(B).
% 15.06/15.23 77 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,szNzAzT0)|B!=slbdtrb0(A)| -aElementOf0(C,B)|aElementOf0(C,szNzAzT0).
% 15.06/15.23 78 [] {+} -aElementOf0(A,szNzAzT0)|B!=slbdtrb0(A)| -aElementOf0(C,B)|sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(C),A).
% 15.06/15.23 84 [] {+} slbdtrb0(sz00)!=slcrc0.
% 15.06/15.23 106 [] {-} aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0).
% 15.06/15.23 107 [] {-} A=A.
% 15.06/15.23 340 [hyper,107,76,106] {-} aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00)).
% 15.06/15.23 1245 [hyper,340,4,unit_del,84] {-} aElementOf0($f1(slbdtrb0(sz00)),slbdtrb0(sz00)).
% 15.06/15.23 14511 [hyper,1245,78,106,107] {-} sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0($f1(slbdtrb0(sz00))),sz00).
% 15.06/15.23 14512 [hyper,1245,77,106,107] {-} aElementOf0($f1(slbdtrb0(sz00)),szNzAzT0).
% 15.06/15.23 22242 [hyper,14511,48,14512] {-} $F.
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 % SZS output end Refutation
% 15.06/15.23 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 ============ end of search ============
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 15.06/15.23
% 15.06/15.23 Process 13944 finished Tue Jul 5 21:48:59 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------