TSTP Solution File: NUM533+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM533+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:56:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 8 ~; 6 |; 12 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn; 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xA)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xB) )
& aSubsetOf0(xA,xB)
& ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xB)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xC) )
& aSubsetOf0(xB,xC) )
=> ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xA)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xC) )
| aSubsetOf0(xA,xC) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FQegyC2xxS/E---3.1_24031.p',m__) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xA)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xB) )
& aSubsetOf0(xA,xB)
& ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xB)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xC) )
& aSubsetOf0(xB,xC) )
=> ( ! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,xA)
=> aElementOf0(X1,xC) )
| aSubsetOf0(xA,xC) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ aElementOf0(X4,xA)
| aElementOf0(X4,xB) )
& aSubsetOf0(xA,xB)
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X5,xB)
| aElementOf0(X5,xC) )
& aSubsetOf0(xB,xC)
& aElementOf0(esk1_0,xA)
& ~ aElementOf0(esk1_0,xC)
& ~ aSubsetOf0(xA,xC) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( aElementOf0(X1,xB)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xA) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
aElementOf0(esk1_0,xA),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(esk1_0,xC),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( aElementOf0(X1,xC)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,xB) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
aElementOf0(esk1_0,xB),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : NUM533+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 14:24:21 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.FQegyC2xxS/E---3.1_24031.p
% 0.36/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.36/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # new_bool_3 with pid 24111 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.36/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.53 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24118 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.36/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.53 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.53 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.36/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.36/0.53
% 0.36/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.36/0.53 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 15
% 0.36/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.36/0.53 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.36/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.36/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 0.36/0.53 # Processed clauses : 44
% 0.36/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.36/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.36/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Generated clauses : 8
% 0.36/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.36/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.36/0.53 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.36/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.36/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.36/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.36/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.36/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.36/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.36/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 23
% 0.36/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.36/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.36/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.36/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.36/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.36/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1332
% 0.36/0.53
% 0.36/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.53 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.36/0.53 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.36/0.53 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.36/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.36/0.53
% 0.36/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.53 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.36/0.53 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.36/0.53 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.36/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.36/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.36/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------