TSTP Solution File: NUM525+3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM525+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:11:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.05s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  22 unt;   1 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (  21 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(Y)
    | sdtasdt0(X,Y) = sdtasdt0(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulComm) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(Y)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(Z)
    | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X,Y),Z) = sdtasdt0(X,sdtasdt0(Y,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulAsso) ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(Y)
    | X = sz00
    | ~ doDivides0(X,Y)
    | Z = sdtsldt0(Y,X)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(Z)
    | Y != sdtasdt0(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefQuot) ).

cnf(65,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xn),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2987) ).

cnf(67,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xp),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2987) ).

cnf(70,hypothesis,
    xp != sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2987) ).

cnf(78,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xm)) = sdtasdt0(xn,xn),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3014) ).

cnf(86,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0('SKOLEMAAAV8'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3046) ).

cnf(87,hypothesis,
    xn = sdtasdt0(xp,'SKOLEMAAAV8'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3046) ).

cnf(88,hypothesis,
    doDivides0(xp,xn),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3046) ).

cnf(89,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xq),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3059) ).

cnf(90,hypothesis,
    xn = sdtasdt0(xp,xq),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3059) ).

cnf(91,hypothesis,
    xq = sdtsldt0(xn,xp),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3059) ).

cnf(92,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xq))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

cnf(93,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xn) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xq))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[92,78,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(280,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xq,xp) = xn,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,89,67]),90,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(954,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xn,'SKOLEMAAAV8') = sdtasdt0(xq,xn),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,89,67,86]),87,280,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1072,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xq) = sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xq)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,67,89,89]),90,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1073,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xn) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xn,xq)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[93,1072,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1077,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xn) = sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xn)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,67,89,65]),90,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1104,plain,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xn),xq) = sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xn,xq)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,67,65,89]) ).

cnf(1105,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xn) != sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xn),xq),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1073,1104,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1106,plain,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xn),'SKOLEMAAAV8') = sdtasdt0(xn,xn),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,67,65,86]),1077,954,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2416,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV8' = xq,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[48,67,65,70,88,86,87]),91,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2420,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1106,1105,2416,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : NUM525+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 15:45:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-05T15:45:22
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n011.cluster.edu at 2022-07-05T15:45:22
% 1.05/1.27  
% 1.05/1.27  
% 1.05/1.27  #||
% 1.05/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.05/1.27  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.05/1.28  ||#
% 1.05/1.28  
% 1.05/1.28  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.05/1.28  ;      6868 formulas have been input or derived (from 86 formulas).
% 1.05/1.28  ;      2420 (35%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.05/1.28  ;          976 (40%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.05/1.28  ;         1444 (60%) are still being kept.
% 1.05/1.28  ; 
% 1.05/1.28  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.015   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.004   0%   Assert                       (46 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.131  16%   Process new row              (6,449 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.429  53%   Resolution                   (170 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.003   0%   Paramodulation               (85 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.002   0%   Condensing                   (224 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.008   1%   Forward subsumption          (224 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.001   0%   Backward subsumption         (167 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (133 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.111  14%   Forward simplification       (6,449 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.055   7%   Backward simplification      (2,419 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.009   1%   Ordering                     (2,210 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.040   5%   Other
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.809        Total
% 1.05/1.28  ;     0.812        Real time
% 1.05/1.28  ; 
% 1.05/1.28  ; Term-hash-array has 5,298 terms in all.
% 1.05/1.28  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 131 entries (152 at peak, 167 added, 36 deleted).
% 1.05/1.28  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 576 nodes (637 at peak, 683 added, 107 deleted).
% 1.05/1.28  ;  Retrieved 127 possibly forward subsuming rows in 224 calls.
% 1.05/1.28  ;  Retrieved 28 possibly backward subsumed rows in 167 calls.
% 1.05/1.28  ; Path-index has 3,229 entries (4,737 at peak, 5,539 added, 2,310 deleted).
% 1.05/1.28  ; Path-index has 749 nodes (807 at peak, 863 added, 114 deleted).
% 1.05/1.28  ; Trie-index has 3,229 entries (4,737 at peak, 5,539 added, 2,310 deleted).
% 1.05/1.28  ; Trie-index has 9,246 nodes (13,783 at peak, 16,551 added, 7,305 deleted).
% 1.05/1.28  ; Retrieved 9,977 generalization terms in 32,786 calls.
% 1.05/1.28  ; Retrieved 2,255 instance terms in 2,251 calls.
% 1.05/1.28  ; Retrieved 817,994 unifiable terms in 38,597 calls.
% 1.05/1.28  ; 
% 1.05/1.28  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 354 entries:
% 1.05/1.28  ;   354 with value 0
% 1.05/1.28  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 1.05/1.28  ;     2 with value 12              1 with value 32               1 with value 37
% 1.05/1.28  ;     2 with value 29
% 1.05/1.28  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 8 entries:
% 1.05/1.28  ;     1 with value 31              2 with value 46               1 with value 51
% 1.05/1.28  ;     1 with value 40              3 with value 47
% 1.05/1.28  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1353 entries:
% 1.05/1.28  ;     2 with value (4 4)         112 with value (4 11)          90 with value (4 18)
% 1.05/1.28  ;    14 with value (4 5)          12 with value (4 12)           2 with value (4 19)
% 1.05/1.28  ;     2 with value (4 6)         240 with value (4 13)          75 with value (4 20)
% 1.05/1.28  ;    52 with value (4 7)          18 with value (4 14)           1 with value (4 21)
% 1.05/1.28  ;   133 with value (4 8)         394 with value (4 15)           1 with value (4 22)
% 1.05/1.28  ;    18 with value (4 9)         143 with value (4 17)           1 with value (4 25)
% 1.05/1.28  ;    43 with value (4 10)
% 1.05/1.28  Evaluation took:
% 1.05/1.28    0.812 seconds of real time
% 1.05/1.28    0.772753 seconds of user run time
% 1.05/1.28    0.038803 seconds of system run time
% 1.05/1.28    [Run times include 0.039 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.05/1.28    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.05/1.28    0 page faults and
% 1.05/1.28    58,646,192 bytes consed.
% 1.05/1.28  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.05/1.28  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-05T15:45:23
% 1.11/1.28  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.11/1.28  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------