TSTP Solution File: NUM514+3 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : NUM514+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:38:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   37
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (   3 unt;  35 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (   6   ~;   4   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   34 (  17   >;  17   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   30 (  30 usr;  18 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn;   1   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    aNaturalNumber0: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    sz10: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    sdtmndt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    doDivides0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    sdtsldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    isPrime0: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    xn: $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    xm: $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    xp: $i ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    xk: $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    xr: $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    esk2_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    esk3_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    esk4_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    esk5_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_43,type,
    esk6_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_44,type,
    esk7_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_45,type,
    esk8_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_46,type,
    esk9_0: $i ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    esk10_0: $i ).

tff(decl_48,type,
    esk11_0: $i ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    esk12_0: $i ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    esk13_0: $i ).

tff(decl_51,type,
    esk14_0: $i ).

tff(decl_52,type,
    esk15_0: $i ).

tff(decl_53,type,
    esk16_0: $i ).

tff(decl_54,type,
    esk17_0: $i ).

tff(decl_55,type,
    esk18_0: $i ).

tff(decl_56,type,
    esk19_0: $i ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
      & xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr)) )
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
          & sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,X1) )
      | doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(m__2613,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xk,xr))
    & xk = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xk,xr))
    & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
    & xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
    & sdtasdt0(xp,sdtsldt0(xk,xr)) = sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2613) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
        & xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr)) )
     => ( ? [X1] :
            ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
            & sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,X1) )
        | doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X113] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
      & xn = sdtasdt0(xr,sdtsldt0(xn,xr))
      & ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X113)
        | sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) != sdtasdt0(xp,X113) )
      & ~ doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm) != sdtasdt0(xp,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xp,sdtsldt0(xk,xr)) = sdtasdt0(sdtsldt0(xn,xr),xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2613]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xk,xr)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2613]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : NUM514+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 16:05:41 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.64  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.64  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.64  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.64  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.64  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.64  % Total time : 0.064000 s
% 0.19/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.64  % Total time : 0.067000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------