TSTP Solution File: NUM491+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM491+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:51:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.62s 2.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   28
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   2 unt;  26 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   3   ~;   2   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   34 (  17   >;  17   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   21 (  21 usr;   9 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (;   1   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdtlseqdt0 > iLess0 > doDivides0 > isPrime0 > aNaturalNumber0 > sdtsldt0 > sdtpldt0 > sdtmndt0 > sdtasdt0 > #nlpp > xr > xp > xn > xm > sz10 > sz00 > #skF_4 > #skF_11 > #skF_6 > #skF_10 > #skF_5 > #skF_9 > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_8 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(xr,type,
    xr: $i ).

tff(sdtasdt0,type,
    sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sz10,type,
    sz10: $i ).

tff(sdtmndt0,type,
    sdtmndt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(sdtlseqdt0,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(isPrime0,type,
    isPrime0: $i > $o ).

tff(aNaturalNumber0,type,
    aNaturalNumber0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(doDivides0,type,
    doDivides0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xp,type,
    xp: $i ).

tff(iLess0,type,
    iLess0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xm,type,
    xm: $i ).

tff(sdtsldt0,type,
    sdtsldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xn,type,
    xn: $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_423,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xn)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xp) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1837) ).

tff(f_534,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [W0] :
          ( aNaturalNumber0(W0)
          & ( sdtasdt0(xp,xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,W0) ) )
      | doDivides0(xp,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(c_145,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_423]) ).

tff(c_454,plain,
    ! [W0_110] :
      ( ( sdtasdt0(xp,xm) != sdtasdt0(xp,W0_110) )
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(W0_110) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_534]) ).

tff(c_488,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_145,c_454]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM491+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:32:38 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.62/2.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.62/2.43  
% 5.62/2.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.62/2.46  
% 5.62/2.46  Inference rules
% 5.62/2.46  ----------------------
% 5.62/2.46  #Ref     : 0
% 5.62/2.46  #Sup     : 9
% 5.62/2.46  #Fact    : 0
% 5.62/2.46  #Define  : 0
% 5.62/2.46  #Split   : 0
% 5.62/2.46  #Chain   : 0
% 5.62/2.46  #Close   : 0
% 5.62/2.46  
% 5.62/2.46  Ordering : KBO
% 5.62/2.46  
% 5.62/2.46  Simplification rules
% 5.62/2.46  ----------------------
% 5.62/2.46  #Subsume      : 5
% 5.62/2.46  #Demod        : 4
% 5.62/2.46  #Tautology    : 5
% 5.62/2.46  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.62/2.46  #BackRed      : 0
% 5.62/2.46  
% 5.62/2.46  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.62/2.46  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.62/2.46  
% 5.62/2.46  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.62/2.46  ----------------------
% 5.62/2.46  Preprocessing        : 0.84
% 5.62/2.46  Parsing              : 0.39
% 5.62/2.46  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 5.62/2.46  Main loop            : 0.59
% 5.62/2.46  Inferencing          : 0.05
% 5.62/2.46  Reduction            : 0.21
% 5.62/2.46  Demodulation         : 0.14
% 5.62/2.46  BG Simplification    : 0.08
% 5.62/2.46  Subsumption          : 0.26
% 5.62/2.46  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 5.62/2.46  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.62/2.46  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.62/2.46  Total                : 1.47
% 5.62/2.46  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.62/2.46  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.62/2.46  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.62/2.46  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------