TSTP Solution File: NUM489+3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : NUM489+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:18:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.77s 2.99s
% Output : Refutation 2.77s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : NUM489+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 13:14:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.77/2.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.77/2.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.77/2.99 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 2.77/2.99 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 2.77/2.99 Thu Jul 7 13:14:08 2022
% 2.77/2.99 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 956.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.77/2.99 set(auto).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 2.77/2.99 clear(print_given).
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 formula_list(usable).
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 2.77/2.99 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 2.77/2.99 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 2.77/2.99 clauses in usable.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.77/2.99 dependent: set(factor).
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 ------------> process usable:
% 2.77/2.99 Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aNaturalNumber0(A)| -aNaturalNumber0(B)|A=B| -sdtlseqdt0(A,B)| -aNaturalNumber0(C)|sdtpldt0(C,A)!=sdtpldt0(C,B).
% 2.77/2.99 Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aNaturalNumber0(A)| -aNaturalNumber0(B)|A=B| -sdtlseqdt0(A,B)| -aNaturalNumber0(C)|sdtpldt0(A,C)!=sdtpldt0(B,C).
% 2.77/2.99 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aNaturalNumber0(A)| -aNaturalNumber0(B)| -aNaturalNumber0(C)|A=sz00|B=C| -sdtlseqdt0(B,C)|sdtasdt0(A,B)!=sdtasdt0(A,C).
% 2.77/2.99 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -aNaturalNumber0(A)| -aNaturalNumber0(B)| -aNaturalNumber0(C)|A=sz00|B=C| -sdtlseqdt0(B,C)|sdtasdt0(B,A)!=sdtasdt0(C,A).
% 2.77/2.99 404 back subsumes 398.
% 2.77/2.99 404 back subsumes 392.
% 2.77/2.99 404 back subsumes 386.
% 2.77/2.99 404 back subsumes 368.
% 2.77/2.99 434 back subsumes 431.
% 2.77/2.99 434 back subsumes 428.
% 2.77/2.99 434 back subsumes 425.
% 2.77/2.99 434 back subsumes 416.
% 2.77/2.99 485 back subsumes 479.
% 2.77/2.99 485 back subsumes 473.
% 2.77/2.99 485 back subsumes 467.
% 2.77/2.99 485 back subsumes 449.
% 2.77/2.99 515 back subsumes 512.
% 2.77/2.99 515 back subsumes 509.
% 2.77/2.99 515 back subsumes 506.
% 2.77/2.99 515 back subsumes 497.
% 2.77/2.99 566 back subsumes 560.
% 2.77/2.99 566 back subsumes 554.
% 2.77/2.99 566 back subsumes 548.
% 2.77/2.99 566 back subsumes 530.
% 2.77/2.99 596 back subsumes 593.
% 2.77/2.99 596 back subsumes 590.
% 2.77/2.99 596 back subsumes 587.
% 2.77/2.99 596 back subsumes 578.
% 2.77/2.99 647 back subsumes 641.
% 2.77/2.99 647 back subsumes 635.
% 2.77/2.99 647 back subsumes 629.
% 2.77/2.99 647 back subsumes 611.
% 2.77/2.99 677 back subsumes 674.
% 2.77/2.99 677 back subsumes 671.
% 2.77/2.99 677 back subsumes 668.
% 2.77/2.99 677 back subsumes 659.
% 2.77/2.99 728 back subsumes 722.
% 2.77/2.99 728 back subsumes 716.
% 2.77/2.99 728 back subsumes 710.
% 2.77/2.99 728 back subsumes 692.
% 2.77/2.99 758 back subsumes 755.
% 2.77/2.99 758 back subsumes 752.
% 2.77/2.99 758 back subsumes 749.
% 2.77/2.99 758 back subsumes 740.
% 2.77/2.99 809 back subsumes 803.
% 2.77/2.99 809 back subsumes 797.
% 2.77/2.99 809 back subsumes 791.
% 2.77/2.99 809 back subsumes 773.
% 2.77/2.99 839 back subsumes 836.
% 2.77/2.99 839 back subsumes 833.
% 2.77/2.99 839 back subsumes 830.
% 2.77/2.99 839 back subsumes 821.
% 2.77/2.99 890 back subsumes 884.
% 2.77/2.99 890 back subsumes 878.
% 2.77/2.99 890 back subsumes 872.
% 2.77/2.99 890 back subsumes 854.
% 2.77/2.99 920 back subsumes 917.
% 2.77/2.99 920 back subsumes 914.
% 2.77/2.99 920 back subsumes 911.
% 2.77/2.99 920 back subsumes 902.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 ------------> process sos:
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.65 sec ----> 1382 [binary,1380.1,281.1] {-} $F.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 Length of proof is 1. Level of proof is 1.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.77/2.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.77/2.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 280 [] {-} xn!=sdtpldt0(xp,xr).
% 2.77/2.99 281 [copy,280,flip.1] {-} sdtpldt0(xp,xr)!=xn.
% 2.77/2.99 1380 [] {-} sdtpldt0(xp,xr)=xn.
% 2.77/2.99 1382 [binary,1380.1,281.1] {-} $F.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.77/2.99 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 ============ end of search ============
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.77/2.99
% 2.77/2.99 Process 956 finished Thu Jul 7 13:14:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------