TSTP Solution File: NUM482+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM482+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.63s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 6 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sz10) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p1i6gnxp/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_68,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xk),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p1i6gnxp/lgb.p',i_0_68) ).
cnf(i_0_50,plain,
( doDivides0(X1,X2)
| X2 != sdtasdt0(X1,X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p1i6gnxp/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p1i6gnxp/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_74,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ isPrime0(X1)
| ~ doDivides0(X1,xk) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p1i6gnxp/lgb.p',i_0_74) ).
cnf(i_0_75,negated_conjecture,
isPrime0(xk),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-p1i6gnxp/lgb.p',i_0_75) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sz10) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_83,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xk),
i_0_68 ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( doDivides0(X1,X2)
| X2 != sdtasdt0(X1,X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3) ),
i_0_50 ).
cnf(c_0_85,hypothesis,
sdtasdt0(xk,sz10) = xk,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]) ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( doDivides0(xk,X1)
| X1 != xk
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]),c_0_86]),c_0_83])]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ isPrime0(X1)
| ~ doDivides0(X1,xk) ),
i_0_74 ).
cnf(c_0_89,hypothesis,
doDivides0(xk,xk),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_83]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
isPrime0(xk),
i_0_75 ).
cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]),c_0_90]),c_0_83])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NUM482+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 05:29:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.63/2.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.63/2.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.63/2.42 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.63/2.42 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 8.63/2.42 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 8.63/2.42 #
% 8.63/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 8.63/2.42
% 8.63/2.42 # Proof found!
% 8.63/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.63/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.63/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.63/2.42
% 8.63/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.63/2.42 # User time : 0.022 s
% 8.63/2.42 # System time : 0.010 s
% 8.63/2.42 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 8.63/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.63/2.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------