TSTP Solution File: NUM472+2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : NUM472+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:07:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 7 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn; 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ? [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
& sdtpldt0(xm,X1) = sdtpldt0(xm,xn) )
| sdtlseqdt0(xm,sdtpldt0(xm,xn)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.42tt6JpZTW/E---3.1_31177.p',m__) ).
fof(m__1379,hypothesis,
( aNaturalNumber0(xq)
& sdtpldt0(xm,xn) = sdtasdt0(xl,xq)
& xq = sdtsldt0(sdtpldt0(xm,xn),xl) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.42tt6JpZTW/E---3.1_31177.p',m__1379) ).
fof(m__1324,hypothesis,
( aNaturalNumber0(xl)
& aNaturalNumber0(xm)
& aNaturalNumber0(xn) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.42tt6JpZTW/E---3.1_31177.p',m__1324) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ? [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
& sdtpldt0(xm,X1) = sdtpldt0(xm,xn) )
| sdtlseqdt0(xm,sdtpldt0(xm,xn)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X75] :
( ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X75)
| sdtpldt0(xm,X75) != sdtpldt0(xm,xn) )
& ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,sdtpldt0(xm,xn)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != sdtpldt0(xm,xn) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xm,xn) = sdtasdt0(xl,xq),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1379]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != sdtasdt0(xl,xq)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1324]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : NUM472+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 14:42:14 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.42tt6JpZTW/E---3.1_31177.p
% 0.17/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 31254 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 31258 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 39
% 0.17/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Initial clauses : 75
% 0.17/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.17/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.17/0.47 # Processed clauses : 101
% 0.17/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # ...subsumed : 5
% 0.17/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 0.17/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 0.17/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.17/0.47 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.17/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.17/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 0.17/0.47 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.17/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.17/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.17/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.17/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 49
% 0.17/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 192
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 69
% 0.17/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 454
% 0.17/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 114
% 0.17/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.17/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.17/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.17/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4780
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1924 pages
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.028 s
% 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.17/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------