TSTP Solution File: NUM464+2 by iProver---3.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.8
% Problem  : NUM464+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:30:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.73s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (  37 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  34   ~;  26   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn;  10   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsC) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ( sz00 != sz10
    & aNaturalNumber0(sz10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsC_01) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X0)
     => ( sdtpldt0(sz00,X0) = X0
        & sdtpldt0(X0,sz00) = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m_AddZero) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X0)
     => ( ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X0)
          & sz10 != X0 )
        | sz10 = X0
        | sz00 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mLENTr) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xn)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xm) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__987) ).

fof(f28,conjecture,
    ( sz00 != xm
   => ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm)
      | ? [X0] :
          ( xm = sdtpldt0(sz10,X0)
          & aNaturalNumber0(X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(f29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( sz00 != xm
     => ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm)
        | ? [X0] :
            ( xm = sdtpldt0(sz10,X0)
            & aNaturalNumber0(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( sdtpldt0(sz00,X0) = X0
        & sdtpldt0(X0,sz00) = X0 )
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X0)
        & sz10 != X0 )
      | sz10 = X0
      | sz00 = X0
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X0)
        & sz10 != X0 )
      | sz10 = X0
      | sz00 = X0
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm)
    & ! [X0] :
        ( xm != sdtpldt0(sz10,X0)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) )
    & sz00 != xm ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm)
    & ! [X0] :
        ( xm != sdtpldt0(sz10,X0)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) )
    & sz00 != xm ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sdtpldt0(X0,sz00) = X0
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X0)
      | sz10 = X0
      | sz00 = X0
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    sz00 != xm,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( xm != sdtpldt0(sz10,X0)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f81]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0)
    | sdtpldt0(X0,sz00) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

cnf(c_92,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0)
    | X0 = sz00
    | X0 = sz10
    | sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

cnf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).

cnf(c_96,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sz10,X0) != xm
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f129]) ).

cnf(c_97,negated_conjecture,
    sz00 != xm,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f128]) ).

cnf(c_2074,plain,
    sdtpldt0(sz10,sz00) = sz10,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_2094,plain,
    ( sz10 != xm
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(sz00) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2074,c_96]) ).

cnf(c_2095,plain,
    sz10 != xm,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2094,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_2602,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    | sz00 = xm
    | sz10 = xm ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_95]) ).

cnf(c_2603,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2602,c_2095,c_97,c_94]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM464+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 15:39:26 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.73/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 2.73/1.17  git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 2.73/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.73/1.17  git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  clauses                                 44
% 2.73/1.17  conjectures                             3
% 2.73/1.17  EPR                                     12
% 2.73/1.17  Horn                                    35
% 2.73/1.17  unary                                   7
% 2.73/1.17  binary                                  8
% 2.73/1.17  lits                                    153
% 2.73/1.17  lits eq                                 44
% 2.73/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.73/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.73/1.17  fd_cond                                 4
% 2.73/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          9
% 2.73/1.17  AC symbols                              0
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ 
% 2.73/1.17  Current options:
% 2.73/1.17  ------ 
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.73/1.17  
% 2.73/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------