TSTP Solution File: NUM464+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM464+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.78s 2.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  13 unt;   2 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (  13 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_45,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | X1 = sz10
    | sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X1)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_48,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    sz00 != xm,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_51) ).

cnf(i_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_49) ).

cnf(i_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sz10,X1) != xm
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-2hllju8r/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | X1 = sz10
    | sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X1)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_61,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    sz00 != xm,
    i_0_51 ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm),
    i_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sz10,X1) != xm
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_65,hypothesis,
    xm = sz10,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),c_0_62]),c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(sz10,X1) != sz10
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    sdtpldt0(sz10,sz00) = sz10,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]),c_0_70])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUM464+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 10:46:25 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.78/2.13  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.78/2.13  # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.78/2.13  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.78/2.13  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 6.78/2.13  # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 6.78/2.13  #
% 6.78/2.13  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 6.78/2.13  
% 6.78/2.13  # Proof found!
% 6.78/2.13  # SZS status Theorem
% 6.78/2.13  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.78/2.13  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.78/2.13  
% 6.78/2.13  # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.78/2.13  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 6.78/2.13  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 6.78/2.13  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 6.78/2.13  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.78/2.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------