TSTP Solution File: NUM464+2 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM464+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:55:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.55s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  21   ~;  18   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn;   5   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( xm != sz00
   => ( ? [X1] :
          ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
          & sdtpldt0(sz10,X1) = xm )
      | sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p',m__) ).

fof(m_AddZero,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
     => ( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
        & X1 = sdtpldt0(sz00,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p',m_AddZero) ).

fof(mLENTr,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
     => ( X1 = sz00
        | X1 = sz10
        | ( sz10 != X1
          & sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p',mLENTr) ).

fof(mSortsC,axiom,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p',mSortsC) ).

fof(mSortsC_01,axiom,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
    & sz10 != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p',mSortsC_01) ).

fof(m__987,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xn) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p',m__987) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( xm != sz00
     => ( ? [X1] :
            ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
            & sdtpldt0(sz10,X1) = xm )
        | sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4] :
      ( xm != sz00
      & ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X4)
        | sdtpldt0(sz10,X4) != xm )
      & ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X32] :
      ( ( sdtpldt0(X32,sz00) = X32
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X32) )
      & ( X32 = sdtpldt0(sz00,X32)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X32) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m_AddZero])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X24] :
      ( ( sz10 != X24
        | X24 = sz00
        | X24 = sz10
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X24) )
      & ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X24)
        | X24 = sz00
        | X24 = sz10
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X24) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mLENTr])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(sz10,X1) != xm ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mSortsC]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mSortsC_01]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10,xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(sz10,X1)
    | X1 = sz00
    | X1 = sz10
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__987]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    xm != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    xm != sz10,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14  % Problem    : NUM464+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:47:53 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lCwfPDzqFx/E---3.1_24463.p
% 0.24/0.55  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.24/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # new_bool_3 with pid 24542 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.55  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 24546 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.24/0.55  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.55  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.55  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.55  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.55  
% 0.24/0.55  # Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.55  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55  # Parsed axioms                        : 28
% 0.24/0.55  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.24/0.55  # Initial clauses                      : 48
% 0.24/0.55  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.24/0.55  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 46
% 0.24/0.55  # Processed clauses                    : 67
% 0.24/0.55  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.24/0.55  # ...remaining for further processing  : 62
% 0.24/0.55  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.24/0.55  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.24/0.55  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.24/0.55  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.24/0.55  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.24/0.55  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.24/0.55  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.24/0.55  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55  # Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.24/0.55  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.24/0.55  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.24/0.55  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.24/0.55  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.24/0.55  # ...number of literals in the above   : 107
% 0.24/0.55  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Current number of archived clauses   : 41
% 0.24/0.55  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 250
% 0.24/0.55  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92
% 0.24/0.55  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.24/0.55  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.24/0.55  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.55  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3315
% 0.24/0.55  
% 0.24/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.55  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.24/0.55  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
% 0.24/0.55  
% 0.24/0.55  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55  # User time                : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.55  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.55  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.24/0.55  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.24/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.24/0.55  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------