TSTP Solution File: NUM460+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM460+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.46s 2.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 10 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_43,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(xm,esk2_0) = xn,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).
cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
aNaturalNumber0(esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(i_0_36,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != xl
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).
cnf(i_0_40,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(xn,esk3_0) = xl,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_41,negated_conjecture,
aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_41) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( aNaturalNumber0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rr8934k6/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtpldt0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(xm,esk2_0) = xn,
i_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
aNaturalNumber0(esk2_0),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_56,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != xl
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_38 ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,sdtpldt0(esk2_0,X1)) = sdtpldt0(xn,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_55]),c_0_56])]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xn,X1) != xl
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(sdtpldt0(esk2_0,X1))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
sdtpldt0(xn,esk3_0) = xl,
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
i_0_41 ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
~ aNaturalNumber0(sdtpldt0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_61])]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( aNaturalNumber0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_61]),c_0_55])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NUM460+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 10:20:33 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.46/2.24 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.46/2.24 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.46/2.24 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.46/2.24 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4d
% 4.46/2.24 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 4.46/2.24 #
% 4.46/2.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 4.46/2.24
% 4.46/2.24 # Proof found!
% 4.46/2.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.46/2.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.46/2.24 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.46/2.24
% 4.46/2.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.46/2.24 # User time : 0.017 s
% 4.46/2.24 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.46/2.24 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 4.46/2.24 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.46/2.24
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------