TSTP Solution File: NUM458+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : NUM458+2 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n073.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.625MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan 8 15:21:24 EST 2018
% Result : Theorem 0.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 44 ( 20 ~; 14 |; 9 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 7 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpuO2X8U/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',mSortsC) ).
fof(7,axiom,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpuO2X8U/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__718) ).
fof(13,conjecture,
( ? [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
& equal(sdtpldt0(xm,X1),xm) )
| sdtlseqdt0(xm,xm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpuO2X8U/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__) ).
fof(14,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
=> ( equal(sdtpldt0(X1,sz00),X1)
& equal(X1,sdtpldt0(sz00,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpuO2X8U/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m_AddZero) ).
fof(22,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ? [X1] :
( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
& equal(sdtpldt0(xm,X1),xm) )
| sdtlseqdt0(xm,xm) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[13]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
cnf(46,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
fof(64,negated_conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ equal(sdtpldt0(xm,X1),xm) )
& ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xm) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
fof(65,negated_conjecture,
( ! [X2] :
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ equal(sdtpldt0(xm,X2),xm) )
& ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xm) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
fof(66,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ equal(sdtpldt0(xm,X2),xm) )
& ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xm) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
cnf(68,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != xm
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66]) ).
fof(69,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ( equal(sdtpldt0(X1,sz00),X1)
& equal(X1,sdtpldt0(sz00,X1)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
fof(70,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ( equal(sdtpldt0(X2,sz00),X2)
& equal(X2,sdtpldt0(sz00,X2)) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
fof(71,plain,
! [X2] :
( ( equal(sdtpldt0(X2,sz00),X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) )
& ( equal(X2,sdtpldt0(sz00,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[70]) ).
cnf(73,plain,
( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[71]) ).
cnf(113,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aNaturalNumber0(sz00)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(xm) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[68,73,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(114,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(xm) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[113,23,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(115,negated_conjecture,
( $false
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[114,46,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(116,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[115,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(117,negated_conjecture,
$false,
116,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM458+2 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n073.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Fri Jan 5 05:17:59 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.28 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.28 --creating new selector for []
% 0.07/0.35 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpuO2X8U/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.35 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpuO2X8U/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.35 -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.35 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.35 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.35 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------