TSTP Solution File: NUM458+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM458+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.34s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 5 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_2or2tet/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_32,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_2or2tet/lgb.p',i_0_32) ).
cnf(i_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != xm
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_2or2tet/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_2or2tet/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
i_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( sdtpldt0(xm,X1) != xm
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xm,sz00) = xm,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : NUM458+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Jul 5 13:15:03 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.34/2.20 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.34/2.20 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.34/2.20 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.34/2.20 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 7.34/2.20 # and selection function SelectComplexG.
% 7.34/2.20 #
% 7.34/2.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.34/2.20
% 7.34/2.20 # Proof found!
% 7.34/2.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.34/2.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.34/2.20 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.34/2.20
% 7.34/2.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.34/2.20 # User time : 0.024 s
% 7.34/2.20 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.34/2.20 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.34/2.20 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.34/2.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------