TSTP Solution File: NUM456+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM456+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.63s 2.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 12 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_197,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(X1,stldt0(sbsmnsldt0(xS)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szAzrzSzezqlpdtcmdtrp0(sz10,xp)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lpkmxtql/lgb.p',i_0_197) ).
cnf(i_0_138,hypothesis,
stldt0(sbsmnsldt0(xS)) = cS2076,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lpkmxtql/lgb.p',i_0_138) ).
cnf(i_0_141,hypothesis,
( X1 = sz10
| X1 = smndt0(sz10)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,stldt0(sbsmnsldt0(xS))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lpkmxtql/lgb.p',i_0_141) ).
cnf(i_0_220,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk28_0,szAzrzSzezqlpdtcmdtrp0(sz10,xp)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lpkmxtql/lgb.p',i_0_220) ).
cnf(i_0_218,hypothesis,
smndt0(sz10) != esk28_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lpkmxtql/lgb.p',i_0_218) ).
cnf(i_0_219,hypothesis,
esk28_0 != sz10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lpkmxtql/lgb.p',i_0_219) ).
cnf(c_0_227,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(X1,stldt0(sbsmnsldt0(xS)))
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szAzrzSzezqlpdtcmdtrp0(sz10,xp)) ),
i_0_197 ).
cnf(c_0_228,hypothesis,
stldt0(sbsmnsldt0(xS)) = cS2076,
i_0_138 ).
cnf(c_0_229,hypothesis,
( X1 = sz10
| X1 = smndt0(sz10)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,stldt0(sbsmnsldt0(xS))) ),
i_0_141 ).
cnf(c_0_230,hypothesis,
( aElementOf0(X1,cS2076)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szAzrzSzezqlpdtcmdtrp0(sz10,xp)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_227,c_0_228]) ).
cnf(c_0_231,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk28_0,szAzrzSzezqlpdtcmdtrp0(sz10,xp)),
i_0_220 ).
cnf(c_0_232,hypothesis,
( X1 = smndt0(sz10)
| X1 = sz10
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,cS2076) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_229,c_0_228]) ).
cnf(c_0_233,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(esk28_0,cS2076),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_230,c_0_231]) ).
cnf(c_0_234,hypothesis,
smndt0(sz10) != esk28_0,
i_0_218 ).
cnf(c_0_235,hypothesis,
esk28_0 != sz10,
i_0_219 ).
cnf(c_0_236,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_232,c_0_233]),c_0_234]),c_0_235]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : NUM456+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 14:40:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.63/2.39 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.63/2.39 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.63/2.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.63/2.39 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 8.63/2.39 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.63/2.39 #
% 8.63/2.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 8.63/2.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.63/2.39
% 8.63/2.39 # Proof found!
% 8.63/2.39 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.63/2.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.63/2.39 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.63/2.39
% 8.63/2.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.63/2.39 # User time : 0.032 s
% 8.63/2.39 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.63/2.39 # Total time : 0.040 s
% 8.63/2.39 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.63/2.39
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------