TSTP Solution File: NUM436+3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : NUM436+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:07:08 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   24 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   97 (  41   ~;  33   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn;   6   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ( ? [X1] :
          ( aInteger0(X1)
          & sdtasdt0(xp,X1) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
      | aDivisorOf0(xp,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
      | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xp) )
    & ( ? [X1] :
          ( aInteger0(X1)
          & sdtasdt0(xq,X1) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
      | aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
      | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xq) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SnmdwXnh8s/E---3.1_20804.p',m__) ).

fof(m__1071,hypothesis,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
    & sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) = sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SnmdwXnh8s/E---3.1_20804.p',m__1071) ).

fof(mIntMult,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2) )
     => aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SnmdwXnh8s/E---3.1_20804.p',mIntMult) ).

fof(m__1032,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xm)
    & sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SnmdwXnh8s/E---3.1_20804.p',m__1032) ).

fof(m__979,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xa)
    & aInteger0(xb)
    & aInteger0(xp)
    & xp != sz00
    & aInteger0(xq)
    & xq != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SnmdwXnh8s/E---3.1_20804.p',m__979) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ? [X1] :
            ( aInteger0(X1)
            & sdtasdt0(xp,X1) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
        | aDivisorOf0(xp,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
        | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xp) )
      & ( ? [X1] :
            ( aInteger0(X1)
            & sdtasdt0(xq,X1) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
        | aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
        | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xq) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X48,X49] :
      ( ( ~ aInteger0(X49)
        | sdtasdt0(xq,X49) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
        | ~ aInteger0(X48)
        | sdtasdt0(xp,X48) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
      & ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
        | ~ aInteger0(X48)
        | sdtasdt0(xp,X48) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
      & ( ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xq)
        | ~ aInteger0(X48)
        | sdtasdt0(xp,X48) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
      & ( ~ aInteger0(X49)
        | sdtasdt0(xq,X49) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(xp,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))) )
      & ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(xp,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))) )
      & ( ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xq)
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(xp,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))) )
      & ( ~ aInteger0(X49)
        | sdtasdt0(xq,X49) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
        | ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xp) )
      & ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
        | ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xp) )
      & ( ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xq)
        | ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,xp) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aInteger0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(xq,X1) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | sdtasdt0(xp,X2) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1071]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X8)
      | ~ aInteger0(X9)
      | aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X8,X9)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mIntMult])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xq,X1) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
    | ~ aInteger0(sdtasdt0(xq,xm))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1032]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xq),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__979]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xq,X1) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) = sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1071]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    ~ aInteger0(sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xp),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__979]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : NUM436+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 13:24:57 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SnmdwXnh8s/E---3.1_20804.p
% 0.19/0.50  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 20881 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G----_Z1014__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with pid 20889 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.50  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.50  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 27
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 57
% 0.19/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 56
% 0.19/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 112
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 111
% 0.19/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 52
% 0.19/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.19/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 51
% 0.19/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.19/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 61
% 0.19/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 51
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 0.19/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.19/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 30
% 0.19/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 98
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 60
% 0.19/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 262
% 0.19/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 143
% 0.19/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% 0.19/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.19/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4011
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1836 pages
% 0.19/0.50  
% 0.19/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.50  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.19/0.50  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 0.19/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.19/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------