TSTP Solution File: NUM434+3 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : NUM434+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:49:16 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.89s 1.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f24,axiom,
    ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,sdtasdt0(xp,xq))
    & aDivisorOf0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
    & ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
        & aInteger0(X0) )
    & sz00 != sdtasdt0(xp,xq) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1003) ).

fof(f25,conjecture,
    ? [X0] :
      ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
      & aInteger0(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(f26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
        & aInteger0(X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
      | ~ aInteger0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
        & aInteger0(X0) )
   => ( sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sK1)
      & aInteger0(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,sdtasdt0(xp,xq))
    & aDivisorOf0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
    & sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sK1)
    & aInteger0(sK1)
    & sz00 != sdtasdt0(xp,xq) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f24,f66]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    aInteger0(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
      | ~ aInteger0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sK1) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    aInteger0(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

cnf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X0) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
    | ~ aInteger0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

cnf(c_800,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xp,xq) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_801,plain,
    smndt0(xb) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_802,plain,
    sdtpldt0(xa,sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_803,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(sP0_iProver_def,X0) != sP2_iProver_def
    | ~ aInteger0(X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_801,c_802,c_800]) ).

cnf(c_1941,plain,
    sdtasdt0(sP0_iProver_def,sK1) = sP2_iProver_def,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_800,c_801,c_802]) ).

cnf(c_1943,plain,
    ~ aInteger0(sK1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1941,c_803]) ).

cnf(c_1944,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1943,c_90]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : NUM434+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Thu May  2 19:19:40 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.89/1.13  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/1.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------  iProver source info
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.89/1.13  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.89/1.13  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Parsing...
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Proving...
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  clauses                                 47
% 2.89/1.13  conjectures                             1
% 2.89/1.13  EPR                                     14
% 2.89/1.13  Horn                                    40
% 2.89/1.13  unary                                   16
% 2.89/1.13  binary                                  13
% 2.89/1.13  lits                                    118
% 2.89/1.13  lits eq                                 34
% 2.89/1.13  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.89/1.13  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.89/1.13  fd_cond                                 7
% 2.89/1.13  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 2.89/1.13  AC symbols                              0
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ 
% 2.89/1.13  Current options:
% 2.89/1.13  ------ 
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  ------ Proving...
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.89/1.13  
% 2.89/1.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------