TSTP Solution File: NUM434+3 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : NUM434+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:35:47 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.39s 0.62s
% Output : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 29 ( 12 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 11 ~; 3 |; 14 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn 2 !; 4 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__1003,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xp,xq) != sz00
& ? [W0] :
( aInteger0(W0)
& sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),W0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
& aDivisorOf0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
& sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,sdtasdt0(xp,xq)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1003) ).
fof(c10,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xp,xq) != sz00
& ? [X3] :
( aInteger0(X3)
& sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X3) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) )
& aDivisorOf0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
& sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,sdtasdt0(xp,xq)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__1003]) ).
fof(c11,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xp,xq) != sz00
& aInteger0(skolem0001)
& sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),skolem0001) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))
& aDivisorOf0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)))
& sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xb,sdtasdt0(xp,xq)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c10]) ).
cnf(c13,plain,
aInteger0(skolem0001),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c11]) ).
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [W0] :
( aInteger0(W0)
& sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),W0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(c6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [W0] :
( aInteger0(W0)
& sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),W0) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c7,negated_conjecture,
! [W0] :
( ~ aInteger0(W0)
| sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),W0) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c6]) ).
fof(c8,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ aInteger0(X2)
| sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X2) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c7]) ).
cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aInteger0(X84)
| sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),X84) != sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c8]) ).
cnf(c14,plain,
sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),skolem0001) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c11]) ).
cnf(c227,plain,
~ aInteger0(skolem0001),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c14,c9]) ).
cnf(c232,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c227,c13]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : NUM434+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 16:07:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.39/0.62 % Version: 1.5
% 0.39/0.62 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.39/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.62
% 0.39/0.62 % Initial clauses : 54
% 0.39/0.62 % Processed clauses : 56
% 0.39/0.62 % Factors computed : 3
% 0.39/0.62 % Resolvents computed: 124
% 0.39/0.62 % Tautologies deleted: 3
% 0.39/0.62 % Forward subsumed : 2
% 0.39/0.62 % Backward subsumed : 0
% 0.39/0.62 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.39/0.62 % User time : 0.249 s
% 0.39/0.62 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.39/0.62 % Total time : 0.264 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------