TSTP Solution File: NUM432+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM432+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:55:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   18 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  118 (  48   ~;  46   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn;  18   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDivisor,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aInteger0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aDivisorOf0(X2,X1)
        <=> ( aInteger0(X2)
            & X2 != sz00
            & ? [X3] :
                ( aInteger0(X3)
                & sdtasdt0(X2,X3) = X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',mDivisor) ).

fof(m__924,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xq,sdtpldt0(xn,xm)) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',m__924) ).

fof(m__818,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xa)
    & aInteger0(xb)
    & aInteger0(xq)
    & xq != sz00
    & aInteger0(xc) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',m__818) ).

fof(mIntPlus,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2) )
     => aInteger0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',mIntPlus) ).

fof(m__899,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xm)
    & sdtasdt0(xq,xm) = sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xc)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',m__899) ).

fof(m__876,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xn)
    & sdtasdt0(xq,xn) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',m__876) ).

fof(mIntNeg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aInteger0(X1)
     => aInteger0(smndt0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',mIntNeg) ).

fof(mEquMod,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2)
        & aInteger0(X3)
        & X3 != sz00 )
     => ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X1,X2,X3)
      <=> aDivisorOf0(X3,sdtpldt0(X1,smndt0(X2))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',mEquMod) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xc,xq),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p',m__) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X29,X30,X32,X33] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X30)
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(X30,X29)
        | ~ aInteger0(X29) )
      & ( X30 != sz00
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(X30,X29)
        | ~ aInteger0(X29) )
      & ( aInteger0(esk1_2(X29,X30))
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(X30,X29)
        | ~ aInteger0(X29) )
      & ( sdtasdt0(X30,esk1_2(X29,X30)) = X29
        | ~ aDivisorOf0(X30,X29)
        | ~ aInteger0(X29) )
      & ( ~ aInteger0(X32)
        | X32 = sz00
        | ~ aInteger0(X33)
        | sdtasdt0(X32,X33) != X29
        | aDivisorOf0(X32,X29)
        | ~ aInteger0(X29) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDivisor])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | aDivisorOf0(X1,X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) != X3
    | ~ aInteger0(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xq,sdtpldt0(xn,xm)) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__924]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xq),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__818]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    xq != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__818]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X5)
      | ~ aInteger0(X6)
      | aInteger0(sdtpldt0(X5,X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mIntPlus])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ( aDivisorOf0(xq,X1)
    | sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc)) != X1
    | ~ aInteger0(sdtpldt0(xn,xm))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( aInteger0(sdtpldt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__899]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xn),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__876]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( aDivisorOf0(xq,X1)
    | sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc)) != X1
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ( aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc)))
    | ~ aInteger0(sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc))) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xa),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__818]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | aInteger0(smndt0(X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mIntNeg])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36] :
      ( ( ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X34,X35,X36)
        | aDivisorOf0(X36,sdtpldt0(X34,smndt0(X35)))
        | ~ aInteger0(X34)
        | ~ aInteger0(X35)
        | ~ aInteger0(X36)
        | X36 = sz00 )
      & ( ~ aDivisorOf0(X36,sdtpldt0(X34,smndt0(X35)))
        | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X34,X35,X36)
        | ~ aInteger0(X34)
        | ~ aInteger0(X35)
        | ~ aInteger0(X36)
        | X36 = sz00 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mEquMod])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc)))
    | ~ aInteger0(smndt0(xc)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( aInteger0(smndt0(X1))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xc),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__818]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xc,xq),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(X2,X3,X1)
    | X1 = sz00
    | ~ aDivisorOf0(X1,sdtpldt0(X2,smndt0(X3)))
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xc))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xc,xq),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_26]),c_0_21]),c_0_12])]),c_0_13]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : NUM432+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:54:59 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.acbgmjV3E8/E---3.1_9018.p
% 0.15/0.42  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 9097 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G----_Z1014__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # G----_Z1014__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 9108 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by G----_Z1014__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 811s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G----_Z1014__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 27
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 45
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 44
% 0.15/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 100
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.15/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 98
% 0.15/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.15/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.15/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 53
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41
% 0.15/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 48
% 0.15/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 0.15/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 49
% 0.15/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 48
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 18
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.15/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 28
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.15/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 116
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 50
% 0.15/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 141
% 0.15/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 89
% 0.15/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.15/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.15/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3403
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.040 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.15/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------